its good for specific application deployments, as intimately tied to the
appserver its bad, since it dictates deployment requirements to have a xul
capable client, ie. non standard, defacto or otherwise.
-kapil
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:26:30 -0800, Fabrice Monaco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the backend (manage) this isn't problem. i have just one suggestion
FireFox+xul+Zope is good ?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Withers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mardi 6 décembre 2005 16:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org; Fabrice Monaco
Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 09:44, Fabrice Monaco wrote:
Why not XUL?
Because it sucks and is browser-specific.
Be careful, or you'll have Paul in tears ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub:
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/hazmat%40objectrealms.net
--
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
