Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9
Fabrice Monaco wrote: Why not XUL? Because you quoted an entire digest message I have only a vague idea of what you're responding to. In the future please cut down the digest to include only the text to which you're replying. Oh, and don't top post. :) To answer the question I presume you're asking (about Ajax and Z3): that space is so immature (not a judgment, just an observation) that the Zope 3 project adopting any particular approach would be premature. We need to survey what people are doing and provide server-side tools that help them do it. -- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 09:44, Fabrice Monaco wrote: > Why not XUL? Because it sucks and is browser-specific. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9
Stephan Richter wrote: On Tuesday 06 December 2005 09:44, Fabrice Monaco wrote: Why not XUL? Because it sucks and is browser-specific. Be careful, or you'll have Paul in tears ;-) Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
RE: [Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9
For the backend (manage) this isn't problem. i have just one suggestion FireFox+xul+Zope is good ? -Original Message- From: Chris Withers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 6 décembre 2005 16:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org; Fabrice Monaco Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9 Stephan Richter wrote: > On Tuesday 06 December 2005 09:44, Fabrice Monaco wrote: > >>Why not XUL? > > Because it sucks and is browser-specific. Be careful, or you'll have Paul in tears ;-) Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9
its good for specific application deployments, as intimately tied to the appserver its bad, since it dictates deployment requirements to have a xul capable client, ie. non standard, defacto or otherwise. -kapil On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:26:30 -0800, Fabrice Monaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For the backend (manage) this isn't problem. i have just one suggestion FireFox+xul+Zope is good ? -Original Message- From: Chris Withers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 6 décembre 2005 16:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org; Fabrice Monaco Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9 Stephan Richter wrote: On Tuesday 06 December 2005 09:44, Fabrice Monaco wrote: Why not XUL? Because it sucks and is browser-specific. Be careful, or you'll have Paul in tears ;-) Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/hazmat%40objectrealms.net -- ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
