Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9
--On 17. November 2005 15:36:23 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Delete the 2.9 branch at this time just for the sake of deleting it would be stupid. I hope that Philipp will finish his work soon so this this issue is not so important. That means: 2.9 branch: feature frozen, open for fixes of course HEAD: open for whatever... I hope the things are clear now :-) I also agreed with Stephan to defer the 2.9 b1 release until 3.2 is ready for a beta release. This means that the goal will remain to release 2.9 and 3.2 together. Although there are no more pending critical bugs in the Zope collector *grins* we should organize a Z2 bug day soon. Any volunteers to organize one? Andreas pgptN6ciYNJYy.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9
--On 17. November 2005 07:45:48 +0800 Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: --On 16. November 2005 14:03:05 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does this mean that the existing 2.9 branch needs to be removed and that the trunk remains frozen? Didn't Florent delete the branch? Obviously he did not as I assumed. So in this case Philipp needs to commit his fixes to the existing 2.9 branch and the HEAD and the HEAD would be open for new code. Yes, I comitted all the changes to both the trunk and the Zope 2.9 branch. They should be identical. So at this point I don't care whether we get rid of it again and recreate it at a later point or simply leave it. Again, Andreas' call. Delete the 2.9 branch at this time just for the sake of deleting it would be stupid. I hope that Philipp will finish his work soon so this this issue is not so important. That means: 2.9 branch: feature frozen, open for fixes of course HEAD: open for whatever... I hope the things are clear now :-) Andreas pgpwLgszI8EUV.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9
Andreas Jung wrote: > --On 16. November 2005 14:03:05 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> >> Does this mean that the existing 2.9 branch needs to be removed and that >> the trunk remains frozen? >> > > Didn't Florent delete the branch? Obviously he did not as I assumed. > So in this case Philipp needs to commit his fixes to the existing 2.9 > branch and the HEAD and the HEAD would be open for new code. Yes, I comitted all the changes to both the trunk and the Zope 2.9 branch. They should be identical. So at this point I don't care whether we get rid of it again and recreate it at a later point or simply leave it. Again, Andreas' call. Note that most of the work I still need to do is happening in the zpkg code, so the Zope code is basically ready for a release. The only things I have on my todo list for Zope 2 are: - stitch in more things from Zope 3 so that ALL unit tests pass (this will effectively mean stitching in twisted, maybe even more). - make some CHANGES.txt entries ;) Philipp ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9
--On 16. November 2005 14:03:05 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does this mean that the existing 2.9 branch needs to be removed and that the trunk remains frozen? Didn't Florent delete the branch? Obviously he did not as I assumed. So in this case Philipp needs to commit his fixes to the existing 2.9 branch and the HEAD and the HEAD would be open for new code. Andreas pgpuuSRN4Rlsj.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 19:47 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: > > --On 14. November 2005 14:25:17 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 00:20 +0800, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > >> Florent Guillaume wrote: > >> > BTW I'm for removing the 2.9 branch for now. > >> > >> You didn't, so I presume 2.9 branch stays? It's important to clear the > >> status of this branch because bugfixes need to be merged to it (see my > >> email about Tres' bugfix, for example). > > > > This is Andreas' call. > > > > Philipp is still working on the zpkg issue and he will require some more > days. As soon as this issue is resolved will cut the 2.9 branch and head > for the 2.9 b1 release. Does this mean that the existing 2.9 branch needs to be removed and that the trunk remains frozen? Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9
--On 14. November 2005 14:25:17 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 00:20 +0800, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Florent Guillaume wrote: > BTW I'm for removing the 2.9 branch for now. You didn't, so I presume 2.9 branch stays? It's important to clear the status of this branch because bugfixes need to be merged to it (see my email about Tres' bugfix, for example). This is Andreas' call. Philipp is still working on the zpkg issue and he will require some more days. As soon as this issue is resolved will cut the 2.9 branch and head for the 2.9 b1 release. Andreas pgpS4CEBeYA0B.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
