Re: [Zope3-Users] Security alert: use of Through-the-Web reStructuredText

2006-07-08 Thread Jim Fulton


On Jul 8, 2006, at 11:49 AM, David Pratt wrote:



Jim Fulton wrote:
Recently, a serious security flaw was found in Zope 2 due to it's  
improper support for allowing reStructuredText to be edited  
through-the-web.  reStructuredText has directives that allow  
inclusion of any file a Zope process could read and inclusion of  
data obtained from fetching arbitrary URLs.  In a trusted  
environment, these directives have legitimate uses.  The feature  
of including files and URL results should not be enabled for text  
entered from untrusted sources, which applies to most through-the- 
web interactions.


Hi Jim. In the case of a wiki, it is the nature of a wiki that  
folks are able to edit through the web.


But a wiki can be edited in other formats that restructured text.  
(Personally, I think
wikis should use tools like Epoz or Kupu to allow direct HTML  
editing, but

that's a different matter.


Wouldn't data validation and any necessary alterations to the  
directives some sense as opposed to removing it from the zope3 mix?


Sure, if someone is willing to do it and take responsibility.  Note  
that I'm not removing these from the release, because they've never  
been in the release.  I didn't even remove them from the repository,  
I just removed them from the Zope 3 tree.


I'm convinced that TTW reST can be safe with suitable attention to  
detail.
So far though, that hasn't happened.  No one has come forward yet and  
said
"I'll maintain this and be responsible for making sure we're secure  
wrt reST".



The recent hotfix:
  http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix-2006-07-05/ 
Hotfix-2006-07-05

addresses the problem for Zope 2.


Perhaps. We don't know for sure. We don't have tests.  We don't know  
if it can
be defeated using a reload product.  It is also a very crude fix. It  
prevents people
from creating add-ons that make legitimate use of file-inclusion or  
the raw
directive.  It was a great fix in an emergency -- and this was a  
serious emergency,

but I don't want to use such a fix in Zope 3.


It is safe to allow reStructuredText through the web with care.   
The inclusion of files or URL results can be disabled, but the  
programmer must explicitly disable the feature.  It is not  
disabled by default. It is also critical that a developer who  
exposes through-the-web reStructuredText have tests to verify that  
the file/url inclusion feature has been disabled.
Zope 3 itself, as released, doesn't have this problem because it  
doesn't allow reST entry through the web.  There are third-party  
applications, however, including 2 packages in the Zope 3  
subversion tree that do have this problem.  I strongly urge you to  
avoid using any Zope package that allows through-the-web input of  
reStructuredText unless you can verify that file/url has been  
properly disabled.
The zwiki and bugtracker packages do not currently disable file/ 
url inclusion and should not be used in situations in which users  
who are not highly trusted have access to these applications.


Can you be explicit about the process of disabling file/url  
inclusion for zope3 (if this is the critical point you are  
making ). The use of restructured text is valuable in zope and  
obviously it is important to understand security measures that  
would allow its continued use.


The reStructuredText documentation gives instructions for disabling it.

But something this risk needs people to be responsible.  I'm not  
seeing that. I expect someone to come forward eventually.  Part of  
being responsible is writing reasonably extensive tests.


If this can be done, why remove the products from the repository  
tree? Would it not be better to apply the necessary fixes?  Many  
thanks.


Because their presence in the Zope 3 tree put people at serious  
risk.  If someone
wants to work on them, great, and they can release them as add-on  
packages.


Jim

--
Jim Fulton  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python 
Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714  
http://www.python.org
Zope Corporationhttp://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org



___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users


Re: [Zope3-Users] Security alert: use of Through-the-Web reStructuredText

2006-07-08 Thread David Pratt


Jim Fulton wrote:
Recently, a serious security flaw was found in Zope 2 due to it's 
improper support for allowing reStructuredText to be edited 
through-the-web.  reStructuredText has directives that allow inclusion 
of any file a Zope process could read and inclusion of data obtained 
from fetching arbitrary URLs.  In a trusted environment, these 
directives have legitimate uses.  The feature of including files and URL 
results should not be enabled for text entered from untrusted sources, 
which applies to most through-the-web interactions.


Hi Jim. In the case of a wiki, it is the nature of a wiki that folks are 
able to edit through the web. Wouldn't data validation and any necessary 
alterations to the directives some sense as opposed to removing it from 
the zope3 mix?




The recent hotfix:

  http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix-2006-07-05/Hotfix-2006-07-05

addresses the problem for Zope 2.

It is safe to allow reStructuredText through the web with care.  The 
inclusion of files or URL results can be disabled, but the programmer 
must explicitly disable the feature.  It is not disabled by default. It 
is also critical that a developer who exposes through-the-web 
reStructuredText have tests to verify that the file/url inclusion 
feature has been disabled.


Zope 3 itself, as released, doesn't have this problem because it doesn't 
allow reST entry through the web.  There are third-party applications, 
however, including 2 packages in the Zope 3 subversion tree that do have 
this problem.  I strongly urge you to avoid using any Zope package that 
allows through-the-web input of reStructuredText unless you can verify 
that file/url has been properly disabled.


The zwiki and bugtracker packages do not currently disable file/url 
inclusion and should not be used in situations in which users who are 
not highly trusted have access to these applications.


Can you be explicit about the process of disabling file/url inclusion 
for zope3 (if this is the critical point you are making ). The use of 
restructured text is valuable in zope and obviously it is important to 
understand security measures that would allow its continued use.


If this can be done, why remove the products from the repository tree? 
Would it not be better to apply the necessary fixes?  Many thanks.


Regards,
David
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users


[Zope3-Users] Security alert: use of Through-the-Web reStructuredText

2006-07-08 Thread Jim Fulton
Recently, a serious security flaw was found in Zope 2 due to it's  
improper support for allowing reStructuredText to be edited through- 
the-web.  reStructuredText has directives that allow inclusion of any  
file a Zope process could read and inclusion of data obtained from  
fetching arbitrary URLs.  In a trusted environment, these directives  
have legitimate uses.  The feature of including files and URL results  
should not be enabled for text entered from untrusted sources, which  
applies to most through-the-web interactions.


The recent hotfix:

  http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix-2006-07-05/Hotfix-2006-07-05

addresses the problem for Zope 2.

It is safe to allow reStructuredText through the web with care.  The  
inclusion of files or URL results can be disabled, but the programmer  
must explicitly disable the feature.  It is not disabled by default.   
It is also critical that a developer who exposes through-the-web  
reStructuredText have tests to verify that the file/url inclusion  
feature has been disabled.


Zope 3 itself, as released, doesn't have this problem because it  
doesn't allow reST entry through the web.  There are third-party  
applications, however, including 2 packages in the Zope 3 subversion  
tree that do have this problem.  I strongly urge you to avoid using  
any Zope package that allows through-the-web input of  
reStructuredText unless you can verify that file/url has been  
properly disabled.


The zwiki and bugtracker packages do not currently disable file/url  
inclusion and should not be used in situations in which users who are  
not highly trusted have access to these applications.  If you are  
using a Zope 3 checkout, these packages are currently included and  
enabled.  I plan to remove these packages from the Zope 3 repository  
tree within the next few hours.  If you are using a checkout-based  
Zope 3 installation that exposes these packages to untrusted users,  
you are strongly urged to disable these packages by removing the  
following files from your package-includes directory:


  zwiki-configure.zcml
  bugtracker-configure.zcml

Removing these files will also avoid problems when you update your  
checkout later, as these will refer to non-existent packages.


Jim

--
Jim Fulton  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python 
Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714  
http://www.python.org
Zope Corporationhttp://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org



___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users


[Zope3-Users] Zope 3 as WSGI app using mod_python

2006-07-08 Thread Achim Domma

Hi,

I'm interested in running Zope 3 via mod_python as WSGI app directly in 
apache. I like the idea to configure different instances simply in my 
apache config and don't have to setup different running zope instances.


The "official" docs do not say much about this option, but there is a 
WSGI handler and I found for example this sample configuration:


http://codespeak.net/svn/z3/modzope/trunk/democonf/apache2.conf

Could somebody tell me what the status of this stuff is? Is it just an 
experiment which might be dropped in the future? Has somebody 
experiences to share?


regards,
Achim
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users