Re: [Zopeskel] [Product-Developers] Ann: ZopeSkel 2.18 released
On Sep 30, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Nate Aune wrote: > Would also like to see the plone hosting stuff get integrated at some point - > its just sitting in a branch right now. Happy to help when needed. > > yes, i have a huge guilt yoke hanging over my head for not getting these > things merged back into the ZopeSkel trunk after the Plone Symposium East > sprint. > > if we don't get to it before the PloneConf, do you guys want to make sure we > prioritize to get this done at the sprint? > > Nate I'm not going to be able to make it to PloneConf, but I do plan on starting the refactoring of zopeskel into smaller packages in the next few days. Hopefully, this will be mostly done by the time PloneConf starts, and we'll be able to release the refactored version as ZopeSkel 3.0! If you've got questions about the refactoring, see SPLITTING_PROPOSAL.txt in the zopeskel trunk. It lays out the rational and plan for this work in detail. The only question that remains unresolved is that of which repository to use. I'm hoping to be able to punt on that question for a little while yet. c Cris Ewing Webmaster, Lead Developer Department of Radiology Web Services University of Washington School of Medicine Work Phone: (206) 616-1288 Cell Phone: (206) 708-9083 E-mail: cew...@u.washington.edu Web: http://www.rad.washington.edu *** ___ ZopeSkel mailing list ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel
Re: [Zopeskel] [Product-Developers] Ann: ZopeSkel 2.18 released
On Sep 30, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Elizabeth Leddy wrote: > > On 9/30/10 11:50 AM, Cristopher Ewing wrote: > > Greetings, all. > > > > Today we release ZopeSkel 2.18, a bugfix release to the venerable code > > generation tool for Zope and Plone. > > > > In this release: > > > > • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/48, bin/zopeskel > > --version now reports current version number > > • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/46, profile directory > > now properly created > > • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/44, portlet titles now > > correctly internationalized in plone domain. > > • we now use plone 3.3.5 as the default plone version for plone3_buildout > I think we should either make it use 4.0, create a separate > plone4_buildout, or rename plone3_buildout to plone_buildout > > Would also like to see the plone hosting stuff get integrated at some point - > its just sitting in a branch right now. Happy to help when needed. > > Liz > Liz, My next step is to begin the great break-up of zopeskel. This means breaking the current, monolithic package into a series of smaller packages (zopeskel.core, zopeskel.zope, zopeskel.plone, etc). This would be the perfect time to bring both the new zopeskel.hosting and zopeskel.dexterity packages into the fold. c Cris Ewing Webmaster, Lead Developer Department of Radiology Web Services University of Washington School of Medicine Work Phone: (206) 616-1288 Cell Phone: (206) 708-9083 E-mail: cew...@u.washington.edu Web: http://www.rad.washington.edu *** ___ ZopeSkel mailing list ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel
Re: [Zopeskel] [Product-Developers] Ann: ZopeSkel 2.18 released
On Sep 30, 2010, at 12:54 PM, David Glick wrote: > On 9/30/10 11:50 AM, Cristopher Ewing wrote: >> Greetings, all. >> >> Today we release ZopeSkel 2.18, a bugfix release to the venerable code >> generation tool for Zope and Plone. >> >> In this release: >> >> • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/48, bin/zopeskel >> --version now reports current version number >> • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/46, profile directory >> now properly created >> • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/44, portlet titles now >> correctly internationalized in plone domain. >> • we now use plone 3.3.5 as the default plone version for plone3_buildout > I think we should either make it use 4.0, create a separate > plone4_buildout, or rename plone3_buildout to plone_buildout > David > Good suggestion, David, I think the 'right' thing to do will be to create a plone4_buildout template. I'm hoping that SteveM will be willing to help in getting one up and running that looks and feels as much like the buildout in the installers as possible. In fact, I'm hoping to get that for the plone3_buildout as well. I'd love to keep ZopeSkel in sync with the installers and vice versa (make sure that the installers always ship with the most up-to-date zopeskel). c Cris Ewing Webmaster, Lead Developer Department of Radiology Web Services University of Washington School of Medicine Work Phone: (206) 616-1288 Cell Phone: (206) 708-9083 E-mail: cew...@u.washington.edu Web: http://www.rad.washington.edu *** ___ ZopeSkel mailing list ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel
Re: [Zopeskel] [Product-Developers] Ann: ZopeSkel 2.18 released
> > Would also like to see the plone hosting stuff get integrated at some point > - its just sitting in a branch right now. Happy to help when needed. > yes, i have a huge guilt yoke hanging over my head for not getting these things merged back into the ZopeSkel trunk after the Plone Symposium East sprint. if we don't get to it before the PloneConf, do you guys want to make sure we prioritize to get this done at the sprint? Nate -- Nate Aune - na...@jazkarta.com http://www.jazkarta.com http://card.ly/natea http://tungle.me/natea +1 (617) 517-4953 ___ ZopeSkel mailing list ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel
Re: [Zopeskel] [Product-Developers] Ann: ZopeSkel 2.18 released
> On 9/30/10 11:50 AM, Cristopher Ewing wrote: > > Greetings, all. > > > > Today we release ZopeSkel 2.18, a bugfix release to the venerable code > generation tool for Zope and Plone. > > > > In this release: > > > > • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/48, bin/zopeskel > --version now reports current version number > > • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/46, profile > directory now properly created > > • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/44, portlet titles > now correctly internationalized in plone domain. > > • we now use plone 3.3.5 as the default plone version for plone3_buildout > I think we should either make it use 4.0, create a separate > plone4_buildout, or rename plone3_buildout to plone_buildout > Would also like to see the plone hosting stuff get integrated at some point - its just sitting in a branch right now. Happy to help when needed. Liz > David > -- > David Glick > Web Developer > davidgl...@groundwire.org > 206.286.1235x32 > > Groundwire: You Are Connected > http://groundwire.org > > We're celebrating 15 years! Come to our big party. > http://groundwire.org/events/groundwires-15th-anniversary-party > ___ > ZopeSkel mailing list > ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel > ___ ZopeSkel mailing list ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel
Re: [Zopeskel] [Product-Developers] Ann: ZopeSkel 2.18 released
On 9/30/10 11:50 AM, Cristopher Ewing wrote: > Greetings, all. > > Today we release ZopeSkel 2.18, a bugfix release to the venerable code > generation tool for Zope and Plone. > > In this release: > > • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/48, bin/zopeskel > --version now reports current version number > • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/46, profile directory now > properly created > • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/44, portlet titles now > correctly internationalized in plone domain. > • we now use plone 3.3.5 as the default plone version for plone3_buildout I think we should either make it use 4.0, create a separate plone4_buildout, or rename plone3_buildout to plone_buildout David -- David Glick Web Developer davidgl...@groundwire.org 206.286.1235x32 Groundwire: You Are Connected http://groundwire.org We're celebrating 15 years! Come to our big party. http://groundwire.org/events/groundwires-15th-anniversary-party ___ ZopeSkel mailing list ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel
[Zopeskel] Ann: ZopeSkel 2.18 released
Greetings, all. Today we release ZopeSkel 2.18, a bugfix release to the venerable code generation tool for Zope and Plone. In this release: • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/48, bin/zopeskel --version now reports current version number • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/46, profile directory now properly created • fix for http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/44, portlet titles now correctly internationalized in plone domain. • we now use plone 3.3.5 as the default plone version for plone3_buildout Thanks to maurits, fRiSi and lucmult for fixes incorporated in this release. c Cris Ewing Webmaster, Lead Developer Department of Radiology Web Services University of Washington School of Medicine Work Phone: (206) 616-1288 Cell Phone: (206) 708-9083 E-mail: cew...@u.washington.edu Web: http://www.rad.washington.edu *** ___ ZopeSkel mailing list ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel
[Zopeskel] [ZopeSkel Issue Tracker] #12 - Re: Z opeSkel-2.10 paster create --config does not use supplied ' package' template variable
A new response has been given to the issue **ZopeSkel-2.10 paster create --config does not use supplied 'package' template variable** in the tracker **Issue tracker** by **Cris Ewing**. Response Information Issue ZopeSkel-2.10 paster create --config does not use supplied 'package' template variable (http://plone.org/products/zopeskel/issues/12) - Issue state: Unconfirmed -> Rejected - Responsible manager: (UNASSIGNED) -> cewing **Response Details**:: Okay, I just ran exactly the example provided by the original post using zopeskel 2.17. I was not able to replicate the problem. I get the proper package structure: plonetheme.acme plonetheme acme the second example above, posted by Robert points to a problem with using the naked paster command instead of the now-included bin/zopeskel script. Here's what is going on there: As the description mentions, the plone3_portlet template expects a 'nested namespace', which means a package with two nested namespaces inside, like 'plone.portlet.foo'. Instead, the supplied name at the command line is 'delme', which has _no_ dots at all. Paster is not capable of checking to ensure that you've provided logical and usable values for the package name. The user here has not. The zopeskel script (added in v2.15) has validation built-in for this type of user error. Since the first example is not reproducible, and the second example is based on erroneous usage, I'm going to close this ticket as won't fix. I believe that the zopeskel script has fixed all these errors and current tests demonstrate that this is in fact the case. * This is an automated email, please do not reply - plone.org Administrator___ ZopeSkel mailing list ZopeSkel@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/zopeskel