2009/10/26 Phil Race :
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> 2009/10/26 Phil Race :
>>
>>>
>>> The fix looks fine. I think it should go via the build forest, in the
>>> expectation
>>> that build is likely to integrate to master before AWT or 2D (which
>>> would have been the second choice).
>>>
>>>
>>
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/26 Phil Race :
The fix looks fine. I think it should go via the build forest, in the
expectation
that build is likely to integrate to master before AWT or 2D (which
would have been the second choice).
Ok, I can push this now or do you still want to?
2009/10/26 Phil Race :
> The fix looks fine. I think it should go via the build forest, in the
> expectation
> that build is likely to integrate to master before AWT or 2D (which
> would have been the second choice).
>
Ok, I can push this now or do you still want to?
> And its not a proprietary v
The fix looks fine. I think it should go via the build forest, in the
expectation
that build is likely to integrate to master before AWT or 2D (which
would have been the second choice).
And its not a proprietary vs open thing, rather it seemed more efficient
to me to do both at once.
-phil.
An
2009/10/26 Phil Race :
> Igor is also fixing the closed src ..
>
> -phil.
>
Right, well obviously I can't fix the proprietary source code base by
definition. I don't think that's an acceptable reason for refusing
external contributions. If you want to continue to maintain a
proprietary version a
I think that's ok.
I can take Andrew's webrev and apply my changes and then putback to both
workspaces.
-igor
On 10/26/09 1:16 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Igor is also fixing the closed src ..
-phil.
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/26 Igor Nekrestyanov :
Andrew,
i've filed 6895287 for this an
Igor is also fixing the closed src ..
-phil.
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/26 Igor Nekrestyanov :
Andrew,
i've filed 6895287 for this and plan to fix it soon.
(this will likely a bit faster in terms of "time to get fix into master").
-igor
Thanks for filing a bug ID for this.
2009/10/26 Igor Nekrestyanov :
> Andrew,
>
> i've filed 6895287 for this and plan to fix it soon.
> (this will likely a bit faster in terms of "time to get fix into master").
>
> -igor
>
Thanks for filing a bug ID for this. I'm already working on a webrev
for this, so let's not duplicate the work
Andrew,
i've filed 6895287 for this and plan to fix it soon.
(this will likely a bit faster in terms of "time to get fix into master").
-igor
On 10/26/09 11:19 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/26 Kelly O'Hair:
Is someone fixing this bootstrap build problem with
FontManager.getFontPat
2009/10/26 Kelly O'Hair :
>
> Is someone fixing this bootstrap build problem with
> FontManager.getFontPath(true) and the fontchecker?
>
> Not sure I care much how it gets fixed, I just need it fixed.
>
> -kto
>
>
You and me both! I'll look at removing fontchecker.
--
Andrew :-)
Free Java Softw
Is someone fixing this bootstrap build problem with
FontManager.getFontPath(true) and the fontchecker?
Not sure I care much how it gets fixed, I just need it fixed.
-kto
Or we could stop building fontchecker and discard it.
It was introduced in the 1.4.2 when we had native code that
sometimes crashed the JRE on seeing a bad font file.
The windows jre installer used it in 1.4.2 and 1.5.
The installer stopped using it in 1.6 (6239557) but we continued
to build it
2009/8/7 :
> Changeset: 64b0c953635d
> Author: rkennke
> Date: 2009-08-07 18:31 +0200
> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/jdk/rev/64b0c953635d
>
> 6795908: Refactor FontManager
> Reviewed-by: prr, igor
>
> ! make/sun/awt/FILES_export_windows.gmk
> ! make/sun/awt/make.depend
> !
13 matches
Mail list logo
