Thanks for the review Phil!
Cheers,
Mikael
On 2014-02-18 17:37, Phil Race wrote:
> Anything else I should do/test?
No. Sounds fine.
-phil.
On 2/18/14 5:30 PM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
On 2014-02-15 09:31, Phil Race wrote:
Looks OK to me although I just realised there's no bug ID here
Bug
On 2014-02-15 09:31, Phil Race wrote:
Looks OK to me although I just realised there's no bug ID here
Bug created:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035287
FWIW I develop on WIndows, Mac & Linux and I've noticed widely divergent
things that the compilers on these platforms warn about
> Anything else I should do/test?
No. Sounds fine.
-phil.
On 2/18/14 5:30 PM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
On 2014-02-15 09:31, Phil Race wrote:
Looks OK to me although I just realised there's no bug ID here
Bug created:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035287
FWIW I develop on WIndo
* Sergey Bylokhov [2014-02-18 12:35]:
> cc 2d alias also.
>
> The fix looks good. I am curious who will document all new options
> in README-builds.html?
One thing I have always loved about autotools is self documentation.
With this patch, for example, ./configure --help gives me the new option
cc 2d alias also.
The fix looks good. I am curious who will document all new options in
README-builds.html?
On 14.02.2014 21:27, Omair Majid wrote:
* Andrew Hughes [2014-02-13 23:59]:
As I said in the previous e-mail, the minimum I'd be happy with is if
the current patch was updated so sett
Hi Jim,
Let's divide the discussion into two part.
1. Where it is better to hold resolution variants?
Putting resolution variants in Image class brings some questions like:
- Some type of images do not need to have resolution variants
- Should resolution variants have the same type as
