On 5/7/14 5:18 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
If they specify something on the command line, and that doesn't exist,
then we end up with Pisces even if Ductus is available. Is that
intentional?
Well, I decided it was OK as the only people likely to use this were
working on
OpenJDK Pisces improvement
If they specify something on the command line, and that doesn't exist,
then we end up with Pisces even if Ductus is available. Is that
intentional?
Also, why the switch from "getProperty(, default)" to the basic
getProperty() and manually applying the default?
...jim
On 5/7/2014 2:57 PM, Phil Race wrote:
I did away with the doPrivileged and it seems fine ...
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8038875.1/
I'm glad that the doPrivileged block is reduced just to
System.getProperty. Looks good while I still think it's worth
considering replacing Class.forName(p
I did away with the doPrivileged and it seems fine ...
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8038875.1/
-phil.
On 05/07/2014 01:26 PM, Phil Race wrote:
On 5/7/14 12:40 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
You may consider to use the 3-arg version of Class.forName and not
to initialize the class. This is call
On 5/7/14 12:40 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
You may consider to use the 3-arg version of Class.forName and not to
initialize the class. This is called within a doPrivileged block and
it's generally a good convention to invoke the class initialization
of the specified class (from the system prop
On 5/7/2014 12:40 PM, Phil Race wrote:
On 5/7/14 12:26 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 5/7/2014 11:26 AM, Phil Race wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038875
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8038875/
Thanks for taking this on. I have some minor comments:
line 129: if sun.java2d.re
On 5/7/2014 12:26 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 5/7/2014 11:26 AM, Phil Race wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038875
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8038875/
Thanks for taking this on. I have some minor comments:
line 129: if sun.java2d.renderer is set, it finds a custom
Rend
On 5/7/14 12:26 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 5/7/2014 11:26 AM, Phil Race wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038875
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8038875/
Thanks for taking this on. I have some minor comments:
line 129: if sun.java2d.renderer is set, it finds a custom
Render
On 5/7/2014 11:26 AM, Phil Race wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038875
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8038875/
Thanks for taking this on. I have some minor comments:
line 129: if sun.java2d.renderer is set, it finds a custom
RenderingEngine from the bootclasspath (as the
Hello, Jim.
I have started to implement the second solution, and a prototype looks
good to me.
But I got a problem with an appropriate test, do I understand correctly
that there is no way to understand is transparent volatile image
premultiply alpha or not?
Because if I draw a transparent volat
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038875
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8038875/
This is in support of modularisation (ie jigsaw). After the fix
alternate implementations
are loaded using Class.forName() as specified by the system property
sun.java2d.renderer. Note that only the built
11 matches
Mail list logo