On 16/12/2014 18:29, Phil Race wrote:
Yes .. no technical constraint there.
Although I was pondering going further and seeing if we can actually
remove
the public method java.awt.peer.Peer Component.getPeer()
since with the module system the peer package is not accessible and this
is then even
Yes .. no technical constraint there.
Although I was pondering going further and seeing if we can actually remove
the public method java.awt.peer.Peer Component.getPeer()
since with the module system the peer package is not accessible and this
is then even weirder than it is now .. as it effectiv
Stop using them and replace them with new package private methods and a
cross-package accessor (similar to the SurfaceManager.ImageAccessor
pattern)? What are the technical constraints preventing this?
I think the getPeer() method used to be used by AWT applications to tell
if an app was on t
Approved
-phil.
On 12/15/14 10:48 PM, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
Please review this (hopefully) last change to suppress the deprecation
warnings in the java.desktop module:
8067086: Suppress mac-specific deprecation warnings in the
java.desktop module
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darc
Thanks for the review.
Just one more fix to review to finish suppressing the deprecation
warnings in the desktop module; please also see the review request for
JDK-8067086: Suppress mac-specific deprecation warnings in the
java.desktop module:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/20
Approved.
We really need to figure out what to do about getPeer() - for this and
for jigsaw ..
-phil.
On 12/16/2014 9:10 AM, joe darcy wrote:
On 12/16/2014 3:15 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 16/12/2014 06:07, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
Please review the next step of suppressing the deprecation
On 12/16/2014 3:15 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 16/12/2014 06:07, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
Please review the next step of suppressing the deprecation warnings
the client libraries, this time in windows-specific desktop code:
JDK-8067092: Suppress windows-specific deprecation warnings in
t
Hello Sergey,
the change looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Andrew.
On 12/12/2014 12:57 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil.
- philip.r...@oracle.com wrote:
>
> Consistent treatment of concatenating sInverseTx seems right although
> I am not sure of the overall picture here.
>
> Quartz uses "y in
On 16/12/2014 06:07, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
Please review the next step of suppressing the deprecation warnings
the client libraries, this time in windows-specific desktop code:
JDK-8067092: Suppress windows-specific deprecation warnings in the
java.desktop module
http://cr.openjdk
