+1.
-phil.
On 08/04/2015 01:53 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
That is true. I usually don't inspect the class I'm testing to see if
a test is needed since the implementation could change. Instead I
determine what conditions I want to verify and test those conditions
whether or not I "know" that the
That is true. I usually don't inspect the class I'm testing to see if a
test is needed since the implementation could change. Instead I
determine what conditions I want to verify and test those conditions
whether or not I "know" that the code would be doing the right thing there.
It's OK to
Yes, this is the right place. The way to submit patches is a bit more
fuzzy but
I think it'll be fine for this one. I reproduced the crash using your test.
I've filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132985 to track this.
-phil.
On 08/04/2015 07:46 AM, Heikki Aitakangas wrote:
Greeti
There is no need to deprecate them. They are not harmful.
-phil.
On 08/04/2015 03:25 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Probably we can mark these classes as deprecated, in favor to
java.util.ServiceLoader?
On 03.08.15 23:49, Phil Race wrote:
CCC is approved. So I will give this a "+1" .. you just ne
Greetings,
The freeNativeResources function in freetypeScaler.c frees a pointer
obtained from FreeType internals:
stream = scalerInfo->face->stream;
FT_Done_Face(scalerInfo->face);
...snip...
if (stream != NULL) {
free(stream);
}
This is done in order to free a FT_S
Probably we can mark these classes as deprecated, in favor to
java.util.ServiceLoader?
On 03.08.15 23:49, Phil Race wrote:
CCC is approved. So I will give this a "+1" .. you just need one other
reviewer (if
you did not get that already) and you can push.
-phil.
On 07/27/2015 07:10 PM, Stuart
