Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8166034: [macosx] Non-AA Serif font

+1 The wordings that mention: " ... absence of suitable platform fonts to implement a logical font ", is more appropriate. Thanks Have a good day Prahalad N. -- Message: 4 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:32:59 -0700 From: Phil Race To: 2d-dev <2d-dev@openjdk.java.net>

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] Review Request: 8167310 The graphics clip is incorrectly rounded for some fractional scales

On 10/11/16 12:49 PM, Jim Graham wrote: Right now I tried to fix overlapping, which produce visible artifacts and were considered as a bugs. The next issue which I would like to fix is a overlapping of drawImage(). Yes, that bears investigation... I looked into it and the issue is basically

[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8089573: [macosx] Incorrect char to glyph mapping printing on OSX 10.10

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8089573 Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8089573/ See the bug for some images showing the problem of scrambled text when printing. Although only JavaFX is affected the solution is entirely on the JDK side. JavaFX looks up some UI "system" fo

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] RFR JDK-6294607: GIFWriter returns the same compression type twice

+2 Brian On Oct 12, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Phil Race wrote: > +1 > > -phil. > > On 10/12/2016 08:04 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: >> Looks fine.

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8166034: [macosx] Non-AA Serif font always displays as regular - no bold or oblique.

On 12.10.16 20:32, Phil Race wrote: Any way here is my latest proposal which goes the more succinct route but tries to make it clear that logical fonts are affected. Can I get a "+1" from someone ? * Glyphs may not always be rendered with the requested properties (e.g, font * and style) due t

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8166034: [macosx] Non-AA Serif font always displays as regular - no bold or oblique.

I haven't had any feed back on this. Any way here is my latest proposal which goes the more succinct route but tries to make it clear that logical fonts are affected. Can I get a "+1" from someone ? * Glyphs may not always be rendered with the requested properties (e.g, font * and style) due

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] RFR: 8167291:[TEST_BUG] javax/print/attribute/Services_getDocFl.java

+1 -phil. On 10/12/2016 10:04 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote: Hi All, Please review a small test bug fix to make sure postscript support variable is reset before new flavor postscript support is tested, so that if one service supports PS but a next one doesn't, it would not fail. Bug: https

[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] RFR: 8167291:[TEST_BUG] javax/print/attribute/Services_getDocFl.java

Hi All, Please review a small test bug fix to make sure postscript support variable is reset before new flavor postscript support is tested, so that if one service supports PS but a next one doesn't, it would not fail. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167291 hg diff test/javax/

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] RFR JDK-6294607: GIFWriter returns the same compression type twice

+1 -phil. On 10/12/2016 08:04 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: Looks fine. On 06.10.16 11:19, Jayathirth D V wrote: Hi Phil, As discussed offline, I have updated test case to include check for duplication of compression types for all ImageIO plugins. Please review the updated webrev at your c

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] RFR JDK-8167281: IIOMetadataNode bugs in getElementsByTagName and NodeList.item methods

Looks fine to me. -phil. On 10/07/2016 01:48 AM, Jayathirth D V wrote: Hi, Please review the following fix in JDK9 at your convenience: Bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167281 Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jdv/8167281/webrev.00/

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] RFR JDK-6294607: GIFWriter returns the same compression type twice

Looks fine. On 06.10.16 11:19, Jayathirth D V wrote: Hi Phil, As discussed offline, I have updated test case to include check for duplication of compression types for all ImageIO plugins. Please review the updated webrev at your convenience : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jdv/6294607/webrev