Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [9] RFR 8170579: The "Banner page"

2016-12-15 Thread Prahalad Kumar Narayanan
Hello Prasanta I believe the 'Banner Page' setting on Print dialog maps to the JobSheets attribute category. If this is right, the logic to check support for JobSheets attribute category is correct. Few corner cases that I observed with BannerTest: . The test-case does not bail-out when run w

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Font rendering quality in Linux

2016-12-15 Thread Artur Rataj
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Phil Race wrote: > > As I started to say on that list, it seems to me that this may be a > font-specific problem. > Fonts have hints. I've seen similar issues when the hints are poor. > > Unfortunately there is no easy way to know if they are poor. > Some client

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Font rendering quality in Linux

2016-12-15 Thread Phil Race
Yes, this is the right place. As I started to say on that list, it seems to me that this may be a font-specific problem. Fonts have hints. I've seen similar issues when the hints are poor. Unfortunately there is no easy way to know if they are poor. Some clients/apps/rendering systems by policy

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8039273: Font related files should not be modified in ${java.home}/lib

2016-12-15 Thread Phil Race
This whole fontconfig lookup logic is in a doPrivileged. And the code is already opening the directory in the findImpl method called just below the new exists() call. -phil. On 12/15/2016 05:16 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: Hi, Phil. The fix has been updated. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/803

[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Font rendering quality in Linux

2016-12-15 Thread Artur Rataj
Hello, I discussed the problem on dev-build http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2016-December/018353.html but have been redirected here, thanks Eric! I would like to ask why OpenJDK on Linux has by default an inferior font rendering quality, when there are OpenJDK variants also for

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: 8039273: Font related files should not be modified in ${java.home}/lib

2016-12-15 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
Hi, Phil. > The fix has been updated. > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8039273.1/ > 2nd reviewer anyone ? Looks fine. I assume that SecurityException from File.exists() is expected, or the code is executed under doPriviliged() block. > > -phil. > > > On 12/09/2016 09:44 AM, Naoto Sato wrote