That sounds useful, but is your example code complete? Don't you need to declare the "image" variable with the
appropriate generic type?
Also, do we get a lot of compiler warnings if you want to ignore the generics in other code? What's the pain point if
you don't care what the types of the i
Hi,
OK I accept your assurances regarding testing and the observed
behaviours, so "+1" to the fix.
If you plan to push this to jdk 9 please follow the RDP2 process and add
the required "Fix comment" and jdk9-fix-request label.
-phil.
On 03/30/2017 11:32 AM, Anton Litvinov wrote:
Hello Phil,
Hello Phil,
Thank you very much for review of this fix. The new or the 3rd version
of the fix, in which I tried to address your remarks, is created and is
available at the next URL. The changes introduced into the fix are
summarized in the end of the e-mail. Could you please review the new
ve
