Hello Phil
Good day to you.
Thank you for the explanation. I understand your point now.
The code changes look good.
Thank you
Have a good day
Prahalad N.
- Original Message -
From: Phil Race
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 12:14 AM
To: Prahalad Kumar Narayanan; 2d-dev
Subject: Re:
I typed
+ (!(FontUtilities.useT2K && !FontUtilities.useLegacy) ? when I actually
meant + ((!FontUtilities.useT2K && !FontUtilities.useLegacy) ? ie the
first "!" was supposed to be inside ..
I decided to add a debugging option to make it easier to tell what you'd got
and then further decided
+1
On 20/03/2018 09:54, Phil Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199870
Diff: inline below
The legal attribution file src/java.desktop/share/legal/colorimaging.md
references the Kodak Color Management System which not only
was never in OpenJDK, but is not in Oracle JDK
In that case the patch is fine.
-phil.
On 03/20/2018 12:15 AM, Jayathirth D V wrote:
HI Phil,
Please find my observation:
In case of DIB header type BITMAPINFOHEADER/ BITMAPV4HEADER/
BITMAPV5HEADER, Microsoft
documentation(https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd183376(v=vs.85).aspx
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199870
Diff: inline below
The legal attribution file src/java.desktop/share/legal/colorimaging.md
references the Kodak Color Management System which not only
was never in OpenJDK, but is not in Oracle JDK anymore either ..
This simple patch just
Hello Phil
Good day to you.
I imported your patch and checked the resulting build.
Warnings showed up as expected with use of "t2k" or "legacy" in the VM option
-Dsun.java2d.font.scaler.
However, I'm unable to interpret this line and its intended outcome.
> It also adds a new value for
HI Phil,
Please find my observation:
In case of DIB header type BITMAPINFOHEADER/ BITMAPV4HEADER/ BITMAPV5HEADER,
Microsoft
documentation(https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd183376(v=vs.85).aspx )
mentions that mask values are valid only when compression type is BI_BITFIELDS.
When
