Hi Shashi,
I think if the overhead can be fixed with a small change, we should do
it as I think we need to keep the code optimized with whatever code is
present now.
If in future, if somebody changes the function order, like
doCompare(prev..., curr..) to doCompare(curr..., prev..) [what you ar
FYI -this change
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8218965.1/
includes a small harfbuzz fix by Martin as well ; he fixed it as well in
the upstream harfbuzz project .
Best regards, Matthias
From: Magnus Ihse Bursie
Sent: Montag, 18. Februar 2019 15:46
To: Doerr, Martin
Yes .. I see that ...
https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/commit/5c2bb1de8de31fecf0dae2ef905b896e42d39f1d
.. looks ok ..
although I soon need to upgrade harfbuzz in JDK and the
current release of 2.3.1 doesn't have that change.
If there's a hb release with it soon I can use that or I will try
t
