Looks fine.
On 28/02/2019 17:55, Philip Race wrote:
Oh yes we should :-). Good catch.
The license isn't changed so its a small matter of changing what version we
list in the file.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8210782.1
-phil.
On 2/28/19, 4:58 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Phil.
Should we
On 21/02/2019 22:48, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 21/02/2019 04:23, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
Thank you, Sergey, for looking into this.
I guess this case requires more investigation. At first sight, it
does not look right, does it?
Right, I am not sure that "IndexColorModel" is selected intentionally
On 2/27/19 12:20 PM, Philip Race wrote:
> The webrev still appears to be against jdk/jdk not jdk/client
>
> I had suggested excluding small point sizes since I don't think
> the failures I saw can possibly be limited to Solaris ... it just
> hasn't been reproduced elsewhere yet.
Apologies for the
Build changes look good.
/Erik
On 2019-02-28 16:12, Philip Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210782
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8210782/
This change upgrades JDK 13 from using harfbuzz v 1.8.1 to v 2.3.1
which is currently the latest release of harfbuzz
On 2019-03-01 01:12, Philip Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210782
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8210782/
Looks good from a build PoV.
/Magnus
This change upgrades JDK 13 from using harfbuzz v 1.8.1 to v 2.3.1
which is currently the latest release of har
