; the specification itself wasn't changed.
Thanks,
-Dmitry
13.11.2013 19:07, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
Hi Phil, Guys ,
This one is stuck waiting for review for quite long time.
Please review so we can push this change.
Thanks,
-Dmitry
08.11.2013 12:40, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
Colleagues,
fri
Hi Phil, Guys ,
This one is stuck waiting for review for quite long time.
Please review so we can push this change.
Thanks,
-Dmitry
08.11.2013 12:40, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
Colleagues,
friendly reminder.
Back in early October I did all proposed changes; could you please
review this third
Colleagues,
friendly reminder.
Back in early October I did all proposed changes; could you please
review this third version of doclint fix?
Thanks,
-Dmitry
30.10.2013 20:38, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
Hi guys
I haven't got any review from you on this issue. Can you please review it?
For
Hi guys
I haven't got any review from you on this issue. Can you please review it?
For some issue, my e-mail have changed to dmitry.x.ginzb...@oracle.com
Thanks, Dmitry
*
Dmitry Ginzburg* dmitry.ginzburg at oracle.com
<mailto:2d-dev%40openjdk.java.net?Subject=%5BOpenJDK%202D-Dev%5D
ust use "and", there's no reason it
has to
be an ampersand.
-phil.
On 10/4/2013 5:59 AM, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
Hi, Phil
I renewed webrev against your issues:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/jdk-8025235/webrev.01/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyan/jdk-8025235/webrev.01/>
uld fix this too
9. LIne2D 626: {@code true} would be better here too
10. PrinterJob: {@code .. } again
Make sure you verify by re-running doclint on the fixed repo.
That's all.
-phil.
On 9/26/13 7:21 AM, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
Hello, 2D Team.
Please review the fix for the following issue:
Hello, 2D Team.
Please review the fix for the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025235
The fix is available at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/jdk-8025235/webrev.00/
This is the fix for javadoc errors, on which doclint was showing some
issues.
The patch contains only
