Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8148914: BitDepth.java test fails

Hi Brian, On 2/16/2016 9:36 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: Hi Joe, On Feb 15, 2016, at 11:15 PM, joe darcy > wrote: On 2/15/2016 1:58 PM, Phil Race wrote: Assuming it works, this approach seems better. A slightly modified version of Brian's change does the trick.

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8129822: Define "headful" jtreg keyword

PS Discussion of the next iteration of tiered testing: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2015-June/002325.html Thanks, -Joe On 6/24/2015 4:42 PM, joe darcy wrote: Hello, To support the next iteration of tiered testing in JDK 9, with an eye toward running client library tests,

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request to backport fix for 6708392 to openjdk6

Hello. For fixes that have been soaking in JDK 7 for a while, there is a presumption of their validity. So by default I'm happy to have additional such fixes backported to OpenJDK 6, assuming the change is appropriate for the release, doesn't change the API, etc. -Joe Martin Buchholz wrote

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JNI crashes in FontManager code

Hello. 2D-team, I'm not an expert in this part of the platform, but the reasoning Martin has sent seems sound; please review the fix. Thanks, -Joe Martin Buchholz wrote: Hi font maintainers, This is a bug report, with fix, provided by Hiroshi Yamauchi. This is a crash detected by a google

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Code review request to integrated IcedTea lcms fixes into OpenJDK 6

I've put the change back into OpenJDK 6 build 12. Thanks, -Joe Alexey Ushakov wrote: Looks good for me. Best Regards, Alexey Joseph D. Darcy wrote: Hello. I'm working on getting the baseline OpenJDK 6 code base to pass JCK 6b. Toward that end I'm requesting a co

[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Code review request to integrated IcedTea lcms fixes into OpenJDK 6

Hello. I'm working on getting the baseline OpenJDK 6 code base to pass JCK 6b. Toward that end I'm requesting a code review of my application of little cms patches previously sent in by Keith: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2008-April/000228.html and Tom: http://mail.ope

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] imaging and color classes binary plugs no longer needed (soon)

Roman Kennke wrote: Hi Phil, One of the most glaring holes to date in the openjdk sources are a couple of dozen 2D classes visible at the API level in the packages java.awt.color, java.awt.image, and java.awt.image.renderable. These have been held back from the sources (but included in th