> They might be interested in your regression tests.
>
> Paul
>
> On 10/7/19, 5:28 AM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Yuri Nesterenko"
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> could you please review this downport of
> https://bugs.openjdk.ja
On 01/12/2017 11:34 AM, Prem Balakrishnan wrote:
Hi Phil
Agree with you.
As it’s a PIT bug with a simple fix – on Ajit and Prasanta’s review, I
have already pushed the fix.
And I'm sorry about that. There will be merge :-(.
We cannot push this buggy test to master: jtreg may stop the whole
The patch works; I hope there will be no side-effects.
So +1
-yan
On 12/16/2016 04:16 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
I could finally manage to build on ubuntu16.04 (seems it uses gcc5.4
which is more than officially supported 4.9 causing some hotspot failure).
Anyways, I am seeing the same "un
+1
Thank you! It works.
-yan
On 07/08/2016 08:40 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi All,
Please review a test bug fix whereby clicking on x button of testpanel
does not fail the test.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160882
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8160882/w
+1
Thank you!
-yan
On 06/10/2016 07:38 AM, prasanta sadhukhan wrote:
Hi All,
Increased the timeout of this manual test so that user can read and
verify the instructions within timelimit to avoid timeout.
Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159134
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net
Fine with me!
-yan
PS: this test will still timeout on a system with i.e. PDF
printer (a default setup for Windows 10) but that's not an issue.
On 06/07/2016 12:11 PM, prasanta sadhukhan wrote:
Hi All,
Please review a testbug fix for jdk9 where it was seen that jtreg times
out if print dialog
+1
-yan
On 04/13/2016 01:37 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello,
Please review the fix for jdk9.
This test uncover a few issues:
Test bug:
- Fail on HiDPI system, because the test tries to check the rendering
to the BufferedImage and VolaileImage using some threshold. Fixed by the
"-Dsun.java2d
+1
-yan
On 04/01/2016 08:31 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Please see the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8152183/webrev.01/
One more test (for multi-page tiffs) was added; for now to be ignored
because of JDK-8148454
Thanks,
Alexander
On 3/28/2016 1:07 PM, Alexander Step
+1
-yan
On 03/31/2016 06:52 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Please see
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8149028/webrev.02/
(one more test covering TIFFImageReadParam was added).
Thanks,
Alexander
On 3/29/2016 8:21 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Please see the updated webrev:
http://cr.openj
Looks OK.
-yan
On 03/23/2016 12:46 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello, Sergey,
> Should we also test bmp and jpg?
covered as well
> all of them have a white color and same size
for the 2nd version the images used for the 1st and 2nd checks have
different sizes and colors
Thanks,
Alexander
Looks fine, and works well.
-yan
On 03/11/2016 02:34 PM, prasanta sadhukhan wrote:
Hi Yuri, All,
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151621
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8151621/webrev.00/
It seems when the testcase is executed through jtreg, the main thread
finish
Thank you, Prasanta!
Could you please add this or similar explanation to that
JDK-8058316? Please use all the words/phrases a desperate
tester would search.
If we cannot have a regression test we should
have enough search terms to find this bug in case of
(apparent) regression.
-yan
On 03/03/20
OK with me!
-yan
On 02/03/2016 04:46 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8145780/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145780
Just a single test added.
Thanks,
Alexander
off list: I'm afraid it will be on Jan 11-th earliest.
-yan
On 12/28/2015 04:19 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
I guess, if no objections were raised, we can push it? Otherwise we will
w8 forever. Please double check the changes for some merge issues before
the push.
On 27/10/15 17:07, Sergey Bylok
+1
-yan
On 09/04/2015 03:29 PM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
looks fine.
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 09/04/2015 03:23 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk9.
The updated test does not take into account rounded corners of
decorated window, and sometimes overlap with the Do
Hi Alexander,
the fix looks OK to me.
Thanks,
-yan
On 06/22/2015 06:44 PM, Alexander Kulyakhtin wrote:
Hi,
Could you, please, review the test-only changes for the JDK-8076468
CR: JDK-8076468 "Add @modules to the tests in jdk_desktop test group"
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akulyakh/80
Hi Alexander(s),
I have some problems not with this change but
with the routine itself.
As I understand, this change is automatically generated.
The generator script is imperfect. For instance,
it cannot catch dependencies in places like
javax/swing/RepaintManager/6608456/bug6608456.java
where t
On 03/04/2015 04:35 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 04.03.2015 15:51, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 04/03/2015 12:37, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk 9.
There are a number of public API whichreference the unsupported
java.awt.peer interfaces.
public java.awt.Component.getPee
Hi Joe,
there seems to be several reasons:
-- in some cases this just adds an extra line between items in
successive construction. Remove the , and these s will
stay as close to each other as regular lines in the document.
Which means too close, or did mean for original author of the doc.
See
Changeset: 4592f0985e78
Author:yan
Date: 2013-11-20 12:23 +0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/2d/jdk/rev/4592f0985e78
8025235: [javadoc] fix some errors in 2D
Reviewed-by: prr, yan
Contributed-by: Dmitry Ginzburg
! src/share/classes/java/awt/Font.java
! src/share/classes/ja
Formally, I can approve this fix, I think, and I do,
taking (not so huge) responsibility for it.
Essentially, Phil has it approved and other properly 2d people have
the previous versions scanned. So, I'm pushing it.
Thanks,
-yan
On 11/19/2013 07:23 PM, Dmitry Ginzburg wrote:
Hi guys,
Сould you
Artem Ananiev wrote:
Mandy Chung wrote:
6879044: Eliminate the dependency of logging from the JRE
core/awt/swing classes
...
I have quickly looked through AWT/2D changes and haven't found anything
suspicious. A funny typo is noticed in X11 key logging (see XToolkit or
XWindow for examples
Changeset: 5c2c81120555
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-06-25 12:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/langtools/rev/5c2c81120555
Added tag jdk7-b62 for changeset 6855e5aa3348
! .hgtags
Changeset: 619c768ad104
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-07-02 11:11 -0700
URL: http:/
Changeset: 8905d218cd0d
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-06-25 12:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/jdk/rev/8905d218cd0d
Added tag jdk7-b62 for changeset 12e11fab9a83
! .hgtags
Changeset: 2ed6ed6b5bfc
Author:jgodinez
Date: 2009-06-29 14:42 -0700
URL: http://hg
Changeset: b8a6e883c0a6
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-06-25 12:09 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/jaxws/rev/b8a6e883c0a6
Added tag jdk7-b62 for changeset 75c801c13ea1
! .hgtags
Changeset: aaa25dfd3de6
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-07-02 11:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.
Changeset: ae449e9c04c1
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-06-25 12:09 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/jaxp/rev/ae449e9c04c1
Added tag jdk7-b62 for changeset a97dd57a6260
! .hgtags
Changeset: a10eec7a1edf
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-07-02 11:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.o
Changeset: 8754a3c37762
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-06-25 12:09 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/hotspot/rev/8754a3c37762
Added tag jdk7-b62 for changeset a88386380bda
! .hgtags
Changeset: 821269eca479
Author:ysr
Date: 2009-06-11 12:40 -0700
URL: http://hg.
Changeset: 57f7e028c7ad
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-06-25 12:09 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/rev/57f7e028c7ad
Added tag jdk7-b62 for changeset c7ed15ab92ce
! .hgtags
Changeset: 9849536536d2
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-07-02 11:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjd
Changeset: d20e45cd539f
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-06-25 12:09 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/2d/corba/rev/d20e45cd539f
Added tag jdk7-b62 for changeset 65b66117dbd7
! .hgtags
Changeset: b3ad991d9534
Author:xdono
Date: 2009-07-02 11:10 -0700
URL: http://hg.
Hi Dan,
this new bug, 6599351, seems to be about the same issue, isn't it?
It should be fixed in several releases, as I understand.
Now let's decide: if you will create a patch for your bug then I'll not
work on my, otherwise I'll start but not very fast, either. Anyway,
after your patch is re
30 matches
Mail list logo
