On 03.07.15 1:28, Jim Graham wrote:
If that is the new proper support matrix then the changes look good...
Thanks!
...jim
On 7/2/15 3:13 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 03.07.15 0:55, Jim Graham wrote:
One last thing. The old test in the SurfaceManagers used to only
require FB_OB
In other words, we used to have:
OPAQUE - use a PBUFFER, always accelerated
BITMASK - not accelerated
TRANSLUCENT - use FB if available,
otherwise use a PBUFFER if CAPS_ALPHA,
otherwise not accelerated
Now we have:
OPAQUE - use FB if available, otherwise not accelera
On 03.07.15 0:55, Jim Graham wrote:
One last thing. The old test in the SurfaceManagers used to only
require FB_OBJECT for translucent types, the new test requires
FB_OBJECT for all types. Is that intentional?
Yes, there was an assumption that pbuffers always support opaque
types(translucen
One last thing. The old test in the SurfaceManagers used to only
require FB_OBJECT for translucent types, the new test requires FB_OBJECT
for all types. Is that intentional?
...jim
On 7/2/15 1:04 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 18.06.15 9:30, Jim Graham wrote:
CGLVSM.
+1
-phil.
On 07/02/2015 01:04 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 18.06.15 9:30, Jim Graham wrote:
CGLVSM.java:
In the constructor we claim to accelerate any surface if
CAPS_EXT_FBOBJECT is present, but CGLGC.java has a test to reject
BITMASK. Shouldn't the 2 perform the same test?
Yes you are r
On 18.06.15 9:30, Jim Graham wrote:
CGLVSM.java:
In the constructor we claim to accelerate any surface if
CAPS_EXT_FBOBJECT is present, but CGLGC.java has a test to reject
BITMASK. Shouldn't the 2 perform the same test?
Yes you are right. After additional investigation I found that we
incor
On 6/29/2015 10:35 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Jim.
Thanks for review!
Thew new version of the fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/7188942/webrev.02
Comments about pbuffer were changed.
CGLGC.java:
In createCompatVM() I dislike separated tests for "here is early
rejection of the list of
Hi, Jim.
Thanks for review!
Thew new version of the fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/7188942/webrev.02
Comments about pbuffer were changed.
CGLGC.java:
In createCompatVM() I dislike separated tests for "here is early
rejection of the list of things that I can handle" followed by a list
Hi Sergey,
CGLGC.java:
In createCompatVM() I dislike separated tests for "here is early
rejection of the list of things that I can handle" followed by a list of
tests for things it can handle. For one thing we have to test the type
more than once. But mainly it just seems like the two tests
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk9.
The reason of the removing is a general deprecation of pbuffers, and a
lack of their support in the java2d, because for a long time pbuffers
were not used by default.
Attempts to disable FBO(which are used by default), and enable the
pbufferes will cause
10 matches
Mail list logo
