On 19/07/11 21:09, Mario Torre wrote:
Il giorno mar, 19/07/2011 alle 21.12 +0200, Roman Kennke ha scritto:
IIRC, libfontconfig is also fairly standalone and portable, so when it's
not there, it shouldn't be too hard to compile it.
A while ago I contemplated and started to implement fontconfig i
Il giorno mar, 19/07/2011 alle 21.12 +0200, Roman Kennke ha scritto:
> IIRC, libfontconfig is also fairly standalone and portable, so when it's
> not there, it shouldn't be too hard to compile it.
>
> A while ago I contemplated and started to implement fontconfig in pure
> Java, which is not rocke
IIRC, libfontconfig is also fairly standalone and portable, so when it's
not there, it shouldn't be too hard to compile it.
A while ago I contemplated and started to implement fontconfig in pure
Java, which is not rocket science either, but then lost interest or time
or both.
Cheers, Roman
Am D
PPS SFAIK all JDK7 supported configs have libfontconfig so
I've in fact contemplated for JDk 8 making libfontconfig a compile time
dependency.
Would that be a major problem ?
We really are that dependent on it now, and its such an integral part
of the
way Gnome and KDE desktops work we shoul
PS .. are you running a pure openjdk build or are you running a build which
includes the proprietary Lucida fonts.
Do you have a fontconfig.properties which is customised for AIX ?
If you eliminate both of those, as would be the typical Linux OpenJDK case,
I think it quite likely that without li
On 7/18/11 4:13 PM, Steve Poole wrote:
On 18/07/11 23:14, Phil Race wrote:
Ah you said it was AIX, not Linux. Still, it should have that
library installed
even if the de-ref is fixed.
Not on AIX - its completely optional - and as far we can tell (other
than this particular problem) nothing e
On 18/07/11 23:14, Phil Race wrote:
Ah you said it was AIX, not Linux. Still, it should have that library
installed
even if the de-ref is fixed.
Not on AIX - its completely optional - and as far we can tell (other
than this particular problem) nothing else bad happens.Having said
that I