Fix is pushed in both 8 and 7u40.
Jennifer
On 6/6/2013 1:18 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Hello,
The fix looks fine since appears to be functionally equivalent to
what I suggested in whatever was my last email.
In terms of back porting I think we literally have until Tuesday
to get it into 7u40.
Jenn
Hi Phil,
Thanks for your help. Seems, that I was a bit unlucky...
My colleague Otmar Humbel managed it to get listed successful at the
first time ;-)
Cheers Patrick
Am 06.06.13 23:50, schrieb Phil Race:
On 6/6/2013 2:22 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
Hi Phil,
I sent it in already the *2nd* t
On 6/6/2013 2:22 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
Hi Phil,
I sent it in already the *2nd* time in November last year without
getting any answer :-(
OK. I'll see if I can find the right people to follow up on this.
-phil.
Am 06.06.13 23:10, schrieb Phil Race:
Patrick,
I had supposed you had
Patrick,
I had supposed you had already signed the OCA but I don't see you here
and the list is supposedly completely up to date :
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
After some discussion we decided that this is sufficiently small and
had been posted here already in a si
Hi Phil,
Sounds excellent... I'm looking forward to it...
Cheers Patrick
Am 06.06.13 22:18, schrieb Phil Race:
Hello,
The fix looks fine since appears to be functionally equivalent to
what I suggested in whatever was my last email.
In terms of back porting I think we literally have until Tue
Hello,
The fix looks fine since appears to be functionally equivalent to
what I suggested in whatever was my last email.
In terms of back porting I think we literally have until Tuesday
to get it into 7u40.
Jennifer : can you handle the logistics ?
-phil.
On 5/10/2013 6:15 AM, Patrick Reinhar
Hi Jennifer,
Hi Phil,
How big are the changes to get that to jdk7 update as well? The company
I work for has a lot of customers that this fix would help.
Cheers Patrick
On 06/06/2013 07:35 PM, Jennifer Godinez wrote:
Fix looks good.
Jennifer
On 06/01/2013 01:02 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
Fix looks good.
Jennifer
On 06/01/2013 01:02 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
Hi Phil,
As I'm now back from my holidays I changed the fix according your
suggestions:
http://reinharts.dyndns.org/8013810/v3/webrev
Can you take a look at it? I also restructured my webrev web folders
for all older
Hi Phil,
As I'm now back from my holidays I changed the fix according your
suggestions:
http://reinharts.dyndns.org/8013810/v3/webrev
Can you take a look at it? I also restructured my webrev web folders for
all older revisions.
Cheers
Patrick
On 05/10/2013 12:08 AM, Phil Race wrote:
Pat
Hi Phil,
Am 10.05.13 00:08, schrieb Phil Race:
Patrick,
Maybe you need to be clear in the problem statement. I can't actually
find it anywhere in this email thread. I'm reverse engineering to it
as follows:
You got an IPPPrintService for lookup via
PrintServiceLookup.lookupPrintServices(nul
Patrick,
Maybe you need to be clear in the problem statement. I can't actually
find it anywhere in this email thread. I'm reverse engineering to it as
follows:
You got an IPPPrintService for lookup via
PrintServiceLookup.lookupPrintServices(null, null)
but a UnixPrintService via
attributes
Hi Phil,
Sorry, I can not share your point of the methods getNamedPrinterNameXX()
always returning a UnixPrintService though. That is exactly the point of
inconsistency shown by the test case. As far as I checked it the only
referred places of those getNamedPrinterNameXX() is exactly the
getS
I am assuming this current webrev replaced the previous
one:- http://reinharts.dyndns.org/webrev/
getNamedPrinterNameSysV() and
getNamedPrinterNameBSD()
should not be changed as they should always
create a UnixPrintService and so can do this
directly. You are subverting the code in
there to fi
Hi Jennifer,
I have changed the test to not use non internal packages now that
produces the same results for my case now.
Now I still waiting for the feedback of Phil to get that fixed correctly..
Best regards
Patirck
Quoting Jennifer Godinez :
Yes I have and dicussed with Phil. It looks
14 matches
Mail list logo
