On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:56:12 GMT, Vladimir Kempik wrote:
> > > > Hello, hsdis is a separate out-of-tree project and is not part of this
> > > > jep.
> > >
> > >
> > > Unless there's something I'm missing it only requires a few lines of
> > > change to src/utils/hsdis/makefile (it already has s
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:14:12 GMT, Vladimir Kempik wrote:
> > > > Hello, hsdis is a separate out-of-tree project and is not part of this
> > > > jep.
> > >
> > >
> > > Unless there's something I'm missing it only requires a few lines of
> > > change to src/utils/hsdis/makefile (it already has s
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:06:32 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> Hello, hsdis is a separate out-of-tree project and is not part of this jep.
>>
>> Unless there's something I'm missing it only requires a few lines of change
>> to src/utils/hsdis/makefile (it already has support for macos x86_64)
>
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:35:05 GMT, Alan Hayward
wrote:
> > Hello, hsdis is a separate out-of-tree project and is not part of this jep.
>
> Unless there's something I'm missing it only requires a few lines of change
> to src/utils/hsdis/makefile (it already has support for macos x86_64)
I agree
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:19:34 GMT, Vladimir Kempik wrote:
> Hello, hsdis is a separate out-of-tree project and is not part of this jep.
Unless there's something I'm missing it only requires a few lines of change to
src/utils/hsdis/makefile (it already has support for macos x86_64)
>support for l
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:31:31 GMT, Alan Hayward
wrote:
> You need add macos arm64 to hsdis. Having it working is fairly essential for
> debugging.
>
> Inside src/utils/hsdis, After cloning binutils
>
> ```
> make; make demo; ./build/macosx-arm64/hsdis-demo
> ```
>
> Results in:
>
> ```
> Hell
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:58:27 GMT, Vladimir Kempik wrote:
>> Build changes per se now looks okay. However, I agree with Erik that unless
>> this PR can wait for the JNF removal, at the very least the build docs needs
>> to be updated to explain how to successfully build for this platform. (I can
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 08:36:19 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Build changes per se now looks okay. However, I agree with Erik that unless
> this PR can wait for the JNF removal, at the very least the build docs needs
> to be updated to explain how to successfully build for this platform. (I can
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:59:03 GMT, Anton Kozlov wrote:
>> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port.
>>
>> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and
>> windows/aarch64.
>>
>> Major changes are in:
>> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:00:23 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster
wrote:
>> @luhenry , could you please check this comment, I think SA-agent was MS's
>> job here.
>
> The target is identified by the header file now:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/2200/files#diff-51442e74eeef2163f0f0643df0ae995083
> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port.
>
> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and
> windows/aarch64.
>
> Major changes are in:
> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the new calling convention (subtasks
> JDK-8253817, JDK-8253818)
11 matches
Mail list logo
