On 4/08/2016 6:24 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8163102/webrev.02
The difference is in libraries.m4, where there was still a reference to
SUPPORT_HEADFUL. I tried building a headless configuration without X11
configured, but it unfortunately faile
Hello,
New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8163102/webrev.02
The difference is in libraries.m4, where there was still a reference to
SUPPORT_HEADFUL. I tried building a headless configuration without X11
configured, but it unfortunately failed. libawt.so still requires X11
headers t
Hi Erik,
On 4/08/2016 1:04 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
The current --disable-headful option is weird. Even worse, it doesn't
work since the makefiles still uses the legacy BUILD_HEADLESS_ONLY
variable, which configure never touches.
The confusion around that variable due to its legacy alw
Erik,
David is already cleaning up the jawt.c file here :-
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8140723/webrev.jdk/src/java.desktop/unix/native/libjawt/jawt.c.sdiff.html
Not sure who should win :-)
-phil.
On 8/3/16, 8:04 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
The current --disable-headful option is
Erik:
The current --disable-headful option is weird. Even worse, it doesn't
work since the makefiles still uses the legacy BUILD_HEADLESS_ONLY
variable, which configure never touches.
In this patch I'm replacing the configure option with
--enable-headless-only. Default is disabled, where bot
Hello,
The current --disable-headful option is weird. Even worse, it doesn't
work since the makefiles still uses the legacy BUILD_HEADLESS_ONLY
variable, which configure never touches.
In this patch I'm replacing the configure option with
--enable-headless-only. Default is disabled, where bo
