Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request to backport fix for 6708392 to openjdk6

2009-09-14 Thread Joe Darcy
Andrew John Hughes wrote: 2009/9/11 Joseph D. Darcy : Hello. For fixes that have been soaking in JDK 7 for a while, there is a presumption of their validity. So by default I'm happy to have additional such fixes backported to OpenJDK 6, assuming the change is appropriate for the release, do

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request to backport fix for 6708392 to openjdk6

2009-09-12 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/9/13 Martin Buchholz : > [Trying to correct the email addresses of original patch authors/reviewers] > > The consensus seems to be that the fix for > 6708392: Provide internal API to create OverrideRedirect windows, XToolkit > belongs in openjdk6 and that it supersedes a similar patch that is

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request to backport fix for 6708392 to openjdk6

2009-09-12 Thread Martin Buchholz
[Trying to correct the email addresses of original patch authors/reviewers] The consensus seems to be that the fix for 6708392: Provide internal API to create OverrideRedirect windows, XToolkit belongs in openjdk6 and that it supersedes a similar patch that is now in icedtea. I am committing it t

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request to backport fix for 6708392 to openjdk6

2009-09-12 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/9/11 Joseph D. Darcy : > Hello. > > For fixes that have been soaking in JDK 7 for a while, there is a > presumption of their validity.  So by default I'm happy to have additional > such fixes backported to OpenJDK 6, assuming the change is appropriate for > the release, doesn't change the API,

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request to backport fix for 6708392 to openjdk6

2009-09-11 Thread Joseph D. Darcy
Hello. For fixes that have been soaking in JDK 7 for a while, there is a presumption of their validity. So by default I'm happy to have additional such fixes backported to OpenJDK 6, assuming the change is appropriate for the release, doesn't change the API, etc. -Joe Martin Buchholz wrote

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request to backport fix for 6708392 to openjdk6

2009-09-11 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/9/11 Mark Wielaard : > On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 18:01 -0700, Martin Buchholz wrote: >> Hi SunToolkit.setOverrideRedirect team, > > Hi Martin, > >> Google engineers have found that >> 6708392: Provide internal API to create OverrideRedirect windows, XToolkit >> is a showstopper bug, >> (for folks

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request to backport fix for 6708392 to openjdk6

2009-09-11 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 18:01 -0700, Martin Buchholz wrote: > Hi SunToolkit.setOverrideRedirect team, Hi Martin, > Google engineers have found that > 6708392: Provide internal API to create OverrideRedirect windows, XToolkit > is a showstopper bug, > (for folks using NX on Windows or Mac) > and tha

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request to backport fix for 6708392 to openjdk6

2009-09-10 Thread Dmitri Trembovetski
Hi Martin, I think this is an AWT bug/fix, may be it would be more appropriate to ask on awt dev list? Thanks, Dmitri Martin Buchholz wrote: Hi SunToolkit.setOverrideRedirect team, Google engineers have found that 6708392: Provide internal API to create OverrideRedirect windows,

[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request to backport fix for 6708392 to openjdk6

2009-09-10 Thread Martin Buchholz
Hi SunToolkit.setOverrideRedirect team, Google engineers have found that 6708392: Provide internal API to create OverrideRedirect windows, XToolkit is a showstopper bug, (for folks using NX on Windows or Mac) and that the fix in openjdk7 fixes it, when trivially backported to openjdk6. Many thank