Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Status of com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2008-08-16 Thread Martin Buchholz
I decided to pursue this a little more, since our code base contains multiple references to com.sun.image.codec.jpeg and I'll probably have to deal with it, even though I know nothing about image I/O. I added the following comment to the bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6527

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Status of com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2008-08-14 Thread Roberto Mannai
Thank you, I posted a request on that same topic (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.distro-packaging.devel/2817). Ciao Roberto > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Chris Campbell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> The history (and fate) of those classes is documented h

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Status of com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2008-08-14 Thread Martin Buchholz
Hi Chris, Thanks very much for that informative pointer. In hindsight, it would have been good if @deprecated warnings had been added to these classes years ago. Today it's probably too late to do much good. Martin On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Chris Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Status of com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2008-08-14 Thread Chris Campbell
Hi Martin, The history (and fate) of those classes is documented here: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6527962 Chris On Aug 14, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote: Hi 2d guys, We're testing different flavors of OpenJDK, and noticing uses of classes in com.sun.image.co

[OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Status of com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2008-08-14 Thread Martin Buchholz
Hi 2d guys, We're testing different flavors of OpenJDK, and noticing uses of classes in com.sun.image.codec.jpeg. These classes are still in non-OpenJDK JDK7. They were removed from OpenJDK, probably because they were encumbered (proprietary Kodak code). The IcedTea folks have created new versions