On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 10:48 -0700, Phil Race wrote:
On 3/24/2015 10:34 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 10:28 -0700, Phil Race wrote:
i.e is it still JBS but there is some other target release value that
should be being used ?
It seems that question has been answered in
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 10:28 -0700, Phil Race wrote:
i.e is it still JBS but there is some other target release value that
should be being used ?
It seems that question has been answered in the link Dalibor sent : its
openjdk7u
for the release.
Yes, this makes totally sense, however the
i.e is it still JBS but there is some other target release value that
should be being used ?
It seems that question has been answered in the link Dalibor sent : its
openjdk7u
for the release.
-phil.
On 3/24/2015 10:16 AM, Phil Race wrote:
I think this is a round-about way of saying that
I think this is a round-about way of saying that Oracle is moving
its OpenJDK efforts off 7 to focus on just jdk8u and jdk9 and
the sustaining engineering group won't be proactively backporting
it to any Oracle JDK7 update release, which is probably just security
releases going forward.
Now,
On 3/24/2015 10:34 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 10:28 -0700, Phil Race wrote:
i.e is it still JBS but there is some other target release value that
should be being used ?
It seems that question has been answered in the link Dalibor sent : its
openjdk7u
for the release.
Yes,
On 24.03.2015 18:34, Mario Torre wrote:
Or will a new backport be createad with openjdk7u as target release?
The proposal is to adjust hgupdater to set fixVersion to 'openjdk7u'
after 7u80 GA on the backport issues which are automatically created for
you when you push to a jdk7u(-dev)
