Re: (313) Serious Grooves

2012-03-06 Thread DB
) Serious Grooves Hi Rob, Yes we missed you too :-) I always thought that Serious Grooves was a KMS sub label, but then again i am not the Oracle of Detroit techno :-) But if someone can shed some inside information, then this would be very interesting. KJ On Feb 24, 2012, at 5:40 PM, rob

RE: (313) Serious Grooves

2012-02-27 Thread John Sokolowski
Maybe someone who can work the twitter thing can ask the man directly? http://twitter.com/kevinsaunderson From: grand...@mac.com Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:47:01 +0100 CC: 313@hyperreal.org To: rob.theaks...@gmail.com Subject: Re: (313) Serious Grooves Hi Rob, Yes we missed you too

Re: (313) Serious Grooves

2012-02-27 Thread Wibo Lammerts
: 313@hyperreal.org To: rob.theaks...@gmail.com Subject: Re: (313) Serious Grooves Hi Rob, Yes we missed you too :-) I always thought that Serious Grooves was a KMS sub label, but then again i am not the Oracle of Detroit techno :-) But if someone can shed some inside information

Re: (313) Serious Grooves

2012-02-25 Thread Klaas-Jan Jongsma
Hi Rob, Yes we missed you too :-) I always thought that Serious Grooves was a KMS sub label, but then again i am not the Oracle of Detroit techno :-) But if someone can shed some inside information, then this would be very interesting. KJ On Feb 24, 2012, at 5:40 PM, rob theakston wrote:

(313) Serious Grooves

2012-02-24 Thread rob theakston
Hello, it's me. I've thought about us for a long, long time. And I have a technical question for someone who has smarts beyond me: was Serious Grooves to be considered a KMS sub label or not? I have conflicting information in my notes from a long time ago, but Discogs is saying it wasn't, even