Re: (313) anthony 'shake' shakir - frictionalism - [What about a new Shake LP stuff?]

2009-11-10 Thread JT Stewart
I don't mean to speak for Shake, but I think this may be assuming too much. I first heard an album of new stuff from him in 2003 when we were sitting in car together on the way to the airport...From what I gathered, too much time went by and he has different ideas for an album now. At one point an

Re: (313) anthony 'shake' shakir - frictionalism - [What about a new Shake LP stuff?]

2009-11-09 Thread kent williams
Shake can speak for himself, but I suspect if there's a hold-up, it may not be something that can be discussed in open forums, for any of a number of reasons. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Odeluga, Ken ken.odel...@dowjones.com wrote: Not wanting to appear churlish, this retrospective

Re: (313) anthony 'shake' shakir - frictionalism - [What about a new Shake LP stuff?]

2009-11-09 Thread james.hurl...@utoronto.ca
Speaking of Shake, I was a little bummed out that he couldn't make it to his Tresor gig last Saturday due to health conditions (thats what the sign at the door said). Will have to wait until the hardwax party I guess. kent williams wrote: Shake can speak for himself, but I suspect if there's