I needed to hear/read something other than the rhetoric on t.v. and in the mainstream press. This is something I found that I think every U.S. citizen should consider because I am afraid of what the U.S. government and military's response will be and what affect that will have...

well for what it's worth, here's the article:

http://www.thenation.com/thebeat/

Mario Cuomo's reasoned response: "This is not like Pearl Harbor" September 12 @ 1:27pm
COLUMN

WASHINGTON -- I have not seen with my own eyes the wreckage of the World Trade Center in New York, but I have seen the damage to the Pentagon. And I can say with certainty that television does not begin to provide a full sense of the devastation.

This is a horrific moment in American history, and it is a moment that has not ended. As I write, firefighters battle flames that continue to claim portions of the Pentagon, and that continue to produce clouds of smoke that can be seen from locations throughout Washington.

In such a circumstance, hyperbole becomes commonplace. At its most extreme, the current hyperbole has taken the form of comparisons of this crisis with the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941. The comparisons say less about the reality of what has occurred than they do about the lack of credible reference points.

Yet, as newspaper headlines echo Franklin Delano Roosevent’s language of 1941 ("Infamy!" declares the front page of today's Washington Times newspaper) and as politicians recall the pre-orld War II rhetoric ("This is not a time to bring people to justice, this is a time to wage war," U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., told the Senate), reasonable analysis is hard to come by.

All the more of a blessing, then, is the wisdom of Mario Cuomo.

The former governor of New York has been speaking necessary truths in the aftermath of Tuesday’s terrorist attack on his hometown of New York City, counseling against the rush to rhetorical excess that has become such a common characteristic of contemporary tragedy.

"People analogize to Pearl Harbor," Cuomo said, his voice filled with disapproval. "This is not like Pearl Harbor because with Pearl Harbor we knew the enemy."

There was no question on December 7, 1941, that the attack had been launched by a foreign government, Japan. And there was no question, as Roosevelt's immediate action in response to the attack illustrated, that America knew precisely where to direct its anger. "We could say, 'Here we go,'" explained Cuomo.

Today, argues the veteran lawyer and commentator on ethical issues, we have no such certainty. Perhaps there is a connection to Saudi fugitive Osama bin Laden, who previously was linked to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, Cuomo said. Perhaps that connection will be established firmly at some point in the near future. When it is, Cuomo continued, there will be a place for action.

But at this point the connection has not been made, he explained, and the danger of leaping to "certain" judgements and the even more certain actions that follow upon them, is too great. Cuomo warned that, to succumb to the desire for a satisfying but not necessarily just or effective retribution is, itself, un-American.

Rather than make this moment out as a Pearl Harbor sixty years on, Cuomo says, America’s leaders need to rededicate themselves not only to identifying those responsible for the current terrorism but also to determining why terrorism seems to have become so commonplace. Developing realistic anti-terrorist responses is a matter of will, Cuomo says, and that will has been in short supply. "We haven't done it. Why? We didn't choose to," Cuomo said, referring to the failure of the U.S. government to counter terrorist threats by addressing an array of concerns -- from airport security to energy conservation.

In addition to responding to the horrific tragedy of this moment, Cuomo said ,America must move to counter the ongoing "quiet tragedies" of poverty, inadequate health care and other unmet basic needs around the world.

That response to human need, Cuomo says, is a vital tool in any realistic struggle against terrorism, since denial and disenfranchisement can breed terrorism.

Ultimately, Cuomo is arguing, America must move beyond simplistic responses to a wiser, more realistic approach to terrorism. And that means, in particular, that the United States must avoid any rush to limit the basic rights of citizens.

"There are allowances you can give government without losing your vital freedoms," argued Cuomo, who said it is wholly possible to increase security -- with somewhat longer delays at airports and other shifts in routine -- while protecting Constitutional rights.



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to