repressed ?
yes
At 2/5/2002 -0500 18:43, you wrote:
That would be an affirmative on the Jan re-issue.
At least that what some guy told me.
G
Rob Theakston wrote:
>
> that track is KDJ 30 "JAN". i don't know if that got repressed in the
latest
> slew of re-issues. anyone?
.. . :: http://no
; > slew of re-issues. anyone?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Sicko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:10 PM
> > To: Lester Kenyatta Spence; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> > Subject: Re:
an Sicko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: Lester Kenyatta Spence; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: [313] theo id
>
> which mix was this anyhow? 156? 160?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
> At 1:03 PM -
t;. i don't know if that got repressed in the latest
> > slew of re-issues. anyone?
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Sicko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:10 PM
> > To: Lester Kenyatta Spence; [EMAIL P
;
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Sicko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:10 PM
> To: Lester Kenyatta Spence; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: [313] theo id
>
>
> which mix was this anyhow? 156? 160?
>
&
org
Subject: Re: [313] theo id
which mix was this anyhow? 156? 160?
Thanks,
Dan
At 1:03 PM -0500 12/31/2001, Lester Kenyatta Spence wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Can anyone identify what is going at the 51.40 mark of theo parrish's
&
which mix was this anyhow? 156? 160?
Thanks,
Dan
At 1:03 PM -0500 12/31/2001, Lester Kenyatta Spence wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone identify what is going at the 51.40 mark of theo parrish's
mixoftheweek.com mix?
Its got a spooky string line and voca
