RE: [313] Re: [Re: [313] KDJ no show Glasgow]

2000-11-29 Thread Diana Potts
13@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: [313] Re: [Re: [313] KDJ no show Glasgow] Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 05:17:03 - yeah, but money is what DJ'ing is all about, right? sickening. Mike From: Jason Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: [313] Re: [Re: [313] KDJ no show Glas

RE: [313] Re: [Re: [313] KDJ no show Glasgow]

2000-11-29 Thread Michael Kim
yeah, but money is what DJ'ing is all about, right? sickening. Mike From: Jason Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: [313] Re: [Re: [313] KDJ no show Glasgow] Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 14:59:00 +1000 .Interesting comment ,BTW Paul okenfold(sp?) >recieve

Re: [313] Re: [Re: [313] KDJ no show Glasgow]

2000-11-29 Thread Cyclone Wehner
Not this again!! >.Interesting comment ,BTW Paul okenfold(sp?) >>recieved $120,000 for new years eve 2000...spinning three gigs helicoptered >>from one to others when done @ $60,000 a pop... >>kinda puts $7500 in perspective , huh? > >and how much did millsy get paid for NYE 2000 in melbourne?

RE: [313] Re: [Re: [313] KDJ no show Glasgow]

2000-11-29 Thread Jason Martin
.Interesting comment ,BTW Paul okenfold(sp?) >recieved $120,000 for new years eve 2000...spinning three gigs helicoptered >from one to others when done @ $60,000 a pop... >kinda puts $7500 in perspective , huh? and how much did millsy get paid for NYE 2000 in melbourne? j

Re: [Re: [313] KDJ no show Glasgow]

2000-11-28 Thread Wv909
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (peter mueller) wrote: wether this is true or not, no dj is worth that much money. )()()()()()()()()()()()()()...Interesting comment ,BTW Paul okenfold(sp?) recieved $120,000 for new years eve 2000...spinning three gigs helicoptered from one to others when done @ $60,000 a pop...

Re: [313] KDJ no show Glasgow

2000-11-27 Thread peter mueller
wether this is true or not, no dj is worth that much money. peter - Original Message - From: jas don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi there! > > Just to let the Glasgow 313er's that Mr Kenny Dixon > Jnr > will not be appearing at the Arches this Friday as > mentioned on this list last week. Reaso