----- Original Message -----
From: "tim maughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "et machina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [313] vinylisours...


> beautifully put...i totally agree...just lets not forget the advantages of
> the digital media in regards to broadcasting/distribution...it allows you
to
> get your music to potentially a much vaster audience, while not forcing
you
> to rely on the mainstream, corporate media industry.
>
> theres technology out there thats not being used to its full, and its
gonna
> need innovators with true imagination to make it work.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "et machina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<313@hyperreal.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [313] vinylisours...
>
>
> > tim said:
> > >hate to but into a discussion...and i also love vinyl, but surely CDs
are
> > >easier to produce? with vinyl you're still relient on a
> >
> > but of course easier doesnt necessarily = better, right?
> > to me this adds to the disposable, "look what i got in my happymeal"
> > character of digital media. it's too easy and every copy, infinite
copies
> > are all identical, made solely with 'sweat' of machines not
humans..vinyl
> is
> > definitely more personal...
> >
> > jochem said:
> > >Maybe the most essential point is still missed here....
> > >vinyl is our format..we distribute,press, master em, from the
production
> > >process
> > >up to the expertise its all ours....and every copy is
> >
> > right on, this is the direction of thought that gets to what is valuable
> > about vinyl even if technically it seems to lose to digital. there's a
> > physical element inherent in the process of getting a record made that
> works
> > at many levels; it is less an automatic process, you may have to master
> one
> > place, press another, get sleeves done another, artwork another and this
> > takes work, extra effort and extra involvement. vinyl has an interesting
> > texture [cd's boring, smooth flat industrial perfection, boring and no
> > character] which you might call sexier, like tim does. and conceptually
> its
> > no competition, analog technology is direct, physical, no
coding..surface
> > noise is warm and adds [literally] to the music rather than
> > interrupting/subtracting, getting to techno ideas like machines with
soul
> > etc etc..you could go on and on with this ...> > jt
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
>

Reply via email to