Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread kent williams
Ummm... why are you always such a troll? On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:41 PM, /0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > the best part is that i find this stuff technically fascinating, but > > artistically bankrupt. > > > > tom > > thats because you're not an artist. > > >

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Martin Dust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First thing I said when I saw it was, "why not play it right the first > place" (I know that not the complete point) but I agree with you here Tom. it's just like auto-tune, but for instrumentalists. it makes playing musi

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Martin Dust
Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Martin Dust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think that guy can wear his beard with pride, looks useful but there's no way it will be able to split complex sounds. i disagree, ive been doing something similar in my DSP class where

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread theREALmxyzptlk
but i would guess that someone with a beard like that ... It's ALL in the beard. The software is just a trompe l'oeil. I can simulate bird calls and produce uncomplicated melodies on household appliances with mine, but it's just a shade beyond scruff. the best part is that i find this st

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread /0
- Original Message - From: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 6:38 PM Subject: Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing the best part is that i find this stuff t

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it might be > difficult to do it with the precision to make each sound still sound > good standing alone thinking about this a little more, what would make this challenging is taking out not only the fundamental f

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Martin Dust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that guy can wear his beard with pride, looks useful but there's > no way it will be able to split complex sounds. i disagree, ive been doing something similar in my DSP class where we take a DFT of a signal and the

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
You'd be amazed at what that beard can do. MEK Martin Dust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/17/2008 04:15:31 PM: > I think that guy can wear his beard with pride, looks useful but there's > no way it will be able to split complex sounds. > > m >

RE: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Nik Stoltzman
> And by and large, it has f*ck all to do with Detroit Techno. Why not? It looks like an interesting piece of technology related to music production. Do all mails have to have direct Detroit relevance these days? No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Matt Kane's Brain
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:02 PM, kent williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And by and large, it has f*ck all to do with Detroit Techno. Gold Leader: They're coming in! Three marks at 2-10! [Gold Two is slain by Darth Vader and his wingmen; Gold Leader starts to panic] Gold Leader: It's no good,

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Martin Dust
I think that guy can wear his beard with pride, looks useful but there's no way it will be able to split complex sounds. m

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread kent williams
Like simple pitch correction, it's just a crutch for the talentless until someone starts misusing it. Which is where techno comes in. The rhetoric may be futuristic, but when it comes down to it, techno was constructed with technology left around after it went out of fashion in the mainstream. As

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
cool - now I can play blindfolded and then go back in and manipulate it so it sounds like a tune technology - meh :-/ MEK "Thor Teague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/17/2008 03:34:33 PM: > Unless this is a gimmick or a fake, > > http://www.videosift.com/video/Pitch-correction-like-youve-never

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Matt Kane's Brain
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Thor Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unless this is a gimmick or a fake, > > http://www.videosift.com/video/Pitch-correction-like-youve-never-seen > Everything's a hoax until they start shipping. -- matt kane's brain [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hydrogenproject.

Re: (313) This appears to be completely revolutionary unless I'm missing

2008-03-17 Thread Thor Teague
Also, again unless I am totally missing something, or this is a fake or a gimmick, this means we're officially on a countdown to the time when you can simply unbounce a rendered track woah! On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Thor Teague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unless this is a gimmick or a