but you are incorrect. usually searching nirvana on soulseek yeilds
thousands of hits.
but not this most recent time, indicating that either a) everyone deleted
nirvana off their hard drives, b) there's been a mass exodus of people no
longer using slsk, or c) that something is not functioning as
And my point was that soulseek is the wrong network to be testing with
something huge like Nirvana.
For example I was doing a search for Hit Me Baby One More Time by
Britney Spears (it was for a wedding I was djing at...) and there was
one hit from Ms Spears. But I got about 30 hits from various
My favourite thing about slsk is the way you can chat with the people
you're downloading from, and browse their other files as well.
If you're searching for quite specialist music (for want of a better
term), that maybe only 10 or 20 users, worldwide, have got, it's a
fair-to-middling bet that
Hear hear!
Paz
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Simon Hindle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 14 januari 2005 2:32
Aan: 313@hyperreal.org
Onderwerp: RE: (313) tons of tones
My favourite thing about slsk is the way you can chat with the people you're
downloading from
: Thursday, January 13, 2005 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: (313) tons of tones
what's the story? traffic is so slow on the list that it makes a lurker
like me post. must be in a permanent state of decline
And once again mine's coming through with the question 2 days after the
answer!
Didn't have much joy
-- Original Message --
From: Simon Hindle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My favourite thing about slsk is the way you can chat with the people
you're downloading from, and browse their other files as well.
exactly. there really is a community based around it with many
Alright ' I know there is no ethics going down on this thread.
but it's starting to sound down right loverly ' this business
of trading other people music without their permission ..
just cause I'm friends with my drug dealer doesn't make it legal
..
I guess I'm mostly
And here i was, reading my 313 mail and thinking this was a thread
about Steve Rachmad's Tons of Tones records. I think there should be a
ban on misleading thread names :)
KJ
On 14-jan-05, at 6:37, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
-- Original Message --
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Francis - I would do a search but give it significant time to
come up with results. Let it sit and search for a few hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
really, ive DLed close to 15,000 MP3s, mostly pretty obscure
and tough to find techno house
no-
my point was just that i use something huge in order to test the network
if something seems wrong.
and something was definately off this weekend.
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, David Gillies wrote:
The best thing about soulseek for me is not in finding lots of well
known stuff (like nirvana) but
Hi Aiden,
your right about this place being like a ghost town,
im sure I saw some tumbleweed on my screen the other
day. As for your question I havnt got it but according
to discogs there was one called Platinum
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Tons+Of+Tones
Cheers
BT
--- Aidan O'Doherty [EMAIL
that's the one! why didn't i see it when i checked discogs? must need glasses.
now the hunt begins.
thanks,
aidan
- Original Message -
From: David Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, January 13, 2005 1:14 pm
Subject: Re: (313) tons of tones
Hi Aiden,
your right about
what's the story? traffic is so slow on the list that it makes a lurker
like me post. must be in a permanent state of decline
And once again mine's coming through with the question 2 days after the
answer!
Didn't have much joy with Soulseek, looks like it might be better to use one
of the more
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Didn't have much joy with Soulseek, looks like it might be better
to use one
of the more established P2P networks (nobody had the first 3
things I looked
for).
?!?!?!
really, ive DLed close
Subject
RE: (313) tons of tones
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h.com
there are major problems with the slsk search function lately, i imagine it
will be fixed soon...
soulseek kills the rest, when it's working correctly
-Original Message-
From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jan 13, 2005 3:07 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) tons
-- Original Message --
From: J.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there are major problems with the slsk search function lately, i
imagine it will be fixed soon...
soulseek kills the rest, when it's working correctly
didnt realise that they were having bugs. even when
i did notice the search function not turning up too much
i used Nirvana as a test,, and only came up with a few hundred files
instead of the usual thousands
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:
-- Original Message --
From: J.T. [EMAIL
The best thing about soulseek for me is not in finding lots of well
known stuff (like nirvana) but being able to find lesser known stuff
that I can't find on any other p2p network.
Try typing something 313 related in soulseek and then try it on another
more well known network (perhaps like
19 matches
Mail list logo
