. Review of "Into Submission" at
> >
>
http://www.armchair-dj.com/reviews/i/into_submission.asp.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:31 PM
> > To: Anya Stang; 313
> > S
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:31 PM
> To: Anya Stang; 313
> Subject: Re: [313] submissive.
>
>
> It is an amazing follow up to point 2.. I like into submission more though..
> Its sounds deeper while point 2 was kinda hard.
>
> jake
>
> on 9/7/01 2:28
air-dj.com/reviews/i/into_submission.asp.
-Original Message-
From: Jake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Anya Stang; 313
Subject: Re: [313] submissive.
It is an amazing follow up to point 2.. I like into submission more though..
Its sounds deeper while p
It is an amazing follow up to point 2.. I like into submission more though..
Its sounds deeper while point 2 was kinda hard.
jake
on 9/7/01 2:28 PM, Anya Stang at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I got James Ruskin's "Into Submission" only very
> recently (dbl.12" out on Tresor.173) and I'm
> totally
