https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/456
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/456/0001-Ticket-456-improve-entry-cache-sizing.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/536
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/536/0001-Trac-Ticket-536-Clean-up-compiler-warnings-for-1.3.patch
Description: Cleaning up compiler warnings by:
- declaring config_get_schemamod in proto-slap.h
- putting parentheses around assignment
- ex
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/531
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/531/0001-Trac-Ticket-531-loading-an-entry-from-the-database-s.patch
Bug Description: When loading an entry from the backend, it
is known to be well formed and str2entry_fast() could be used,
but always str2ent
Ludwig,
In the future, can you make all comments of fix reviews in the trac
ticket? We actually never discuss reviews on mailing lists - only in
the trac tickets. Rich missed your comments about this bug.
Thanks,
Mark
On 12/10/2012 10:57 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
And I think be_addsuffix
lets start it using CUDA
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On 12/10/2012 10:57 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
>> And I think be_addsuffix is not safe.
>>
>> If two threads try to add a suffix, both can get the same current count,
>> the both set the new suffix
>> be->be_s
On 12/10/2012 10:57 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
And I think be_addsuffix is not safe.
If two threads try to add a suffix, both can get the same current
count, the both set the new suffix
be->be_suffix[count]= slapi_sdn_dup(suffix);
and then both increment count. the increment is atomic, but
And I think be_addsuffix is not safe.
If two threads try to add a suffix, both can get the same current count,
the both set the new suffix
be->be_suffix[count]= slapi_sdn_dup(suffix);
and then both increment count. the increment is atomic, but the
assignment could be done to the wrong index.
Hi Mark,
in the locked version the list of suffixes cannot be changed while you
loop over them. In your version you get the suffix count and the do a
for loop i=0..count on it. Although suffixes don't get deleted from the
array there couls be cases where one is added from the time you get the
