https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47489/0001-Ticket-47489-Under-specific-values-of-nsDS5ReplicaNa.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47489
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 09/12/2013 07:39 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 09/10/2013 04:35 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 09/10/2013 04:29 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/10/2013 01:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 09/09/2013 07:19 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/09/2013 02:27 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/460
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/460/0001-Ticket-460-support-multiple-subtrees-and-filters.patch
Description:
1. support multiple subtrees
new config parameter in windwows sync agreement:
winSyncSubtreePair: DS Subtree:AD Subtree
On 09/12/2013 04:40 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/12/2013 07:39 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 09/10/2013 04:35 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 09/10/2013 04:29 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 09/10/2013 01:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 09/09/2013 07:19 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On
On 9/9/2013 11:19 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Thanks everyone for the comments. I have added Noriko's suggestion:
http://port389.org/wiki/Design/Fine_Grained_ID_List_Size
David, Ludwig: Does the current design address your concerns, and/or
provide the necessary first step for further
On 9/11/2013 11:41 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
Just out of curiosity, why is keeping a count per key a problem? If
you're using BDB duplicate key support, can't you just use
cursor-c_count() to get this? I.e., BDB already maintains key counts
internally, why not leverage that?
afaik you need
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/449
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/449/0001-Ticket-449-Allow-macro-aci-keywords-to-be-case-insen.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
