On 11/03/2015 10:42 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 03.11.2015 19:30, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Thanks for your patch, Martin. Looks good to me. "ack".
Which version is your patch supposed to be in? Just master is fine?
--noriko
Thank you, master is fine.
Pushed to master:
aff9705..0d1ce9d master
On 03.11.2015 19:30, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Thanks for your patch, Martin. Looks good to me. "ack".
Which version is your patch supposed to be in? Just master is fine?
--noriko
Thank you, master is fine.
Martin
On 11/03/2015 10:24 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
Hello all,
the gcc compiler retur
Thanks for your patch, Martin. Looks good to me. "ack".
Which version is your patch supposed to be in? Just master is fine?
--noriko
On 11/03/2015 10:24 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
Hello all,
the gcc compiler returns warning during compiling of the freeIPA project:
slapi-plugin.h:6149, GNU C C
Hello all,
the gcc compiler returns warning during compiling of the freeIPA project:
slapi-plugin.h:6149, GNU C Compiler 4 (gcc), Priority: Normal
function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
6149 int slapi_rwlock_get_size();
Attached patch should fix the issue.
Thank you, Mar
Hi Thierry,
we already had started to discuss on IRC, but here are my thoughts again.
Is it necessary to explicitely set the txn in the plugin ? The txn will
be found when ldbm_back_delete() does dblayer_txn_begin(9 and it checks
the per thread stack of txns.
In my opinion the real problem is
ticket https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47976
fix
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47976/0001-Ticket-47976-deadlock-in-mep-delete-post-op.patch
test case:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47976/0002-Ticket-47976-test-case.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de