>
> -- Merging lib389 to 389-ds-base
>
> One proposal is to merge them. We would mix in lib389 and the
> dirsrvtests into lib389 tests. It is often the case that lib389's
> features are bound tightly to a version of directory server.
Hi all,
This seems to be the most popular answer right now
Hello,
I have made changes in setup test suit and uploaded patch on ticket [1].
Please review.
Thanks,
Amita
[1]. https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/47840
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 08/22/2017 01:31 AM, William Brown wrote:
I have a question / concern though. I thought that we want dbscan 2
ldif for emergency recovery scenarios when all else has gone bad and
assuming that id2entry is still readable. In the approach you
described we make the assumption that the parentid
