[389-devel] please review: support cgroup v2

2020-02-05 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50885 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50618 — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-02-06 - 97% PASS

2020-02-05 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/02/06/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.7-1.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code o

[389-devel] Re: [PATCH] prevent slapd from hanging under unlikely circumstances

2020-02-05 Thread William Brown
> On 5 Feb 2020, at 20:08, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > > > On 02/05/2020 10:53 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: >> >> >> On 2/5/20 2:30 AM, William Brown wrote: >>> On 5 Feb 2020, at 03:10, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: I think I can agree with 1-8, 9 is one solution to fix the problem you

[389-devel] Re: [PATCH] prevent slapd from hanging under unlikely circumstances

2020-02-05 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 02/05/2020 10:53 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 2/5/20 2:30 AM, William Brown wrote: On 5 Feb 2020, at 03:10, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: I think I can agree with 1-8, 9 is one solution to fix the problem you reported, but not yet validate that there are no other side effects, there are pot

[389-devel] Re: [PATCH] prevent slapd from hanging under unlikely circumstances

2020-02-05 Thread thierry bordaz
On 2/5/20 2:30 AM, William Brown wrote: On 5 Feb 2020, at 03:10, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: I think I can agree with 1-8, 9 is one solution to fix the problem you reported, but not yet validate that there are no other side effects, there are potential postop plugins which should NOT be called