[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

2016-07-06 Thread William Brown
On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 17:38 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > Hi Noriko, > > I have test scenario for not correctly handled modrdns during total init: > > - have a database with n entries, n large enough tthat total init takes > long enough to be able to apply an update while it is running > -

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

2016-07-06 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
Hi Noriko, I have test scenario for not correctly handled modrdns during total init: - have a database with n entries, n large enough tthat total init takes long enough to be able to apply an update while it is running - add two entries -- n+1: cn=child,$SUFFIX -- n+2: cn=parent,$SUFFIX both

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

2016-07-04 Thread William Brown
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 09:37 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > On 07/04/2016 01:32 AM, William Brown wrote: > >>> It's not the "post init" operations I'm worried about. > >>> > >>> It's that operations that were part of the init to the consumer are > >>> replayed from the changelog. > >>> > >>>

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

2016-07-04 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 07/04/2016 01:32 AM, William Brown wrote: It's not the "post init" operations I'm worried about. It's that operations that were part of the init to the consumer are replayed from the changelog. Operations that occurred after the init starts, definitely still need to be replayed, and this

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

2016-07-03 Thread William Brown
> >> > > It's not the "post init" operations I'm worried about. > > > > It's that operations that were part of the init to the consumer are > > replayed from the changelog. > > > > Operations that occurred after the init starts, definitely still need to > > be replayed, and this makes sense. > >

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

2016-07-01 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 07/01/2016 04:08 AM, William Brown wrote: On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 14:53 -0700, Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 06/30/2016 12:45 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi William, the reason that after a total init the consumer does not have the latest state of the supplier RUV and is receiving updates based on

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

2016-06-30 Thread William Brown
On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 14:53 -0700, Noriko Hosoi wrote: > On 06/30/2016 12:45 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > > Hi William, > > > > the reason that after a total init the consumer does not have the > > latest state of the supplier RUV and is receiving updates based on the > > RUV at start of the

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

2016-06-30 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
Hi William, the reason that after a total init the consumer does not have the latest state of the supplier RUV and is receiving updates based on the RUV at start of the total init is independent of the modrdn problem. When a supplier is performing a total init it is still accepting changes,