And I think be_addsuffix is not safe.
If two threads try to add a suffix, both can get the same current count,
the both set the new suffix
be-be_suffix[count]= slapi_sdn_dup(suffix);
and then both increment count. the increment is atomic, but the
assignment could be done to the wrong index.
On 12/10/2012 10:57 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
And I think be_addsuffix is not safe.
If two threads try to add a suffix, both can get the same current
count, the both set the new suffix
be-be_suffix[count]= slapi_sdn_dup(suffix);
and then both increment count. the increment is atomic, but
lets start it using CUDA
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Mark Reynolds marey...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/10/2012 10:57 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
And I think be_addsuffix is not safe.
If two threads try to add a suffix, both can get the same current count,
the both set the new suffix
