Hello, all. I read in a post from 2006 that 389 does not support
referential integrity for memberuid. That would seem like a great
inconvenience. Has that been changed or is it still impossible? Is
there any chance of it changing? I suppose we are a little spoiled in
our environment in that
Thanks Rich,
I'll give it a try when I get home tonight.
- David
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.comwrote:
Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
Hi All,
I have a quick question. I am using Fedora 12 and just installed 389
Directory Server yesterday.
I
On 02/17/2010 01:36 PM, serge.ste...@fmsb.be wrote:
I still have one problem that prevent me to migrate from tivoli to 389
ldap
i have a problem with the birthdate attribute. I have encoded this in
a ldif
with the format MMJJHHMMSS but it refuse my question is
what is the format that i
