>
>From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>[389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Gordon Messmer
>[yiny...@eburg.com]
>Sent: 22 July 2010 04:17
>To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
>Subject: Re: [389-
>
>From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>[389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Gerrard Geldenhuis
>[gerrard.geldenh...@betfair.com]
>Sent: 21 July 2010 16:37
>To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
>S
Barry Sitompul wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I've been running around hassling people here to get a physical server
> that I can use to replicate the problem but it has not been
> successful, so I'll get back to you when I have one.
>
> Another thing is, I did pmap on the ns-sl
Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote:
>>
>> From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> [389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] on behalf of Gerrard Geldenhuis
>> [gerrard.geldenh...@betfair.com]
>> Sent: 21 July 2010 16:37
>> To: General discussion list fo
On 07/22/2010 02:33 AM, Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote:
>
> It is unfortunate. It would be nice if you could do a logical AND in
> PAM to utilize two sources of authentication. My understanding was
> that PAM is the bastion for all authentication and that nothing
> happens without its say so.
Just to be
