Re: [389-users] DNA configuration question

2011-11-08 Thread cnu
Hello, yes read-only replica is my configuration. Thanks, DNA is working perfectly. thanks, br cnu On 08.11.2011 16:31, Nathan Kinder wrote: > On 11/08/2011 04:52 AM, cnu wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I use 389 directory server 1.2.8.1 in a master slave replication >> configuration. >> One master and

[389-users] Replication and Password Changes

2011-11-08 Thread Tom Tucker
Please pardon any blunders in my LDAP vernacular. My LDAP exposure has been limited thus far. I am testing Fedora 389 Directory Server as a replacement from my antique Sun One (5.X) directory server. Things have gone well so far btw. Q1) My first hurdle was confirming my ability to perform succe

Re: [389-users] Hiding key fields from ldap searches

2011-11-08 Thread Chun Tat David Chu
Hi David, My project doesn't require such requirement, we only need to restrict access on directory level only. But according to Red Hat Directory Server documentation you should be able to restrict what attributes an user can see. Please see http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_S

[389-users] Hiding key fields from ldap searches

2011-11-08 Thread David Hoskinson
We have been able to run ldapsearchs that revealed what we consider private info on certain fields such as sambalmpassword, sambantpassword for example. Even though they are crypted we would like to restrict certain fields to directory managers and not anonymous searches. I believe this is wha

Re: [389-users] replication issues with promoting hub to master

2011-11-08 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/08/2011 09:41 AM, Anderson, Cary wrote: All, I am having issues with replication breaking once I promote a hub to a multi-master. My test set-up has a master/hub/slave environment using basic replication. This works as intended. However, once I select multi-master and set the replic

Re: [389-users] Replication frequency

2011-11-08 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/08/2011 09:51 AM, Gerhardus Geldenhuis wrote: Hi David, It can be whatever you want. So either immediate/best effort or every 10min or every Sunday when it is full moon. The documentation should tell all, and you should see the options when you set it up in the interface. By default it

Re: [389-users] Replication frequency

2011-11-08 Thread Gerhardus Geldenhuis
Hi David, It can be whatever you want. So either immediate/best effort or every 10min or every Sunday when it is full moon. The documentation should tell all, and you should see the options when you set it up in the interface. Regards On 8 November 2011 16:46, David Hoskinson wrote: > Should be

[389-users] Replication frequency

2011-11-08 Thread David Hoskinson
Should be an easy one... can anyone tell me how often replication takes place in a multimaster setup? Is this a timed event or does a change trigger the replication. Working on a status check and want to see which direction to go... thanks. David Hoskinson | DATATRAK International Systems Eng