Re: [389-users] Replacing a DS server

2012-03-08 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/08/2012 11:05 AM, mja...@guesswho.com wrote: Thx for the heads-up. Would I be better off just adding the new server with a new IP address as a multi-master, then removing the old one? Not re-using either the hostname or IP? That would certainly be easier. *From:*Rich Megginson [mail

Re: [389-users] Replacing a DS server

2012-03-08 Thread mjames
Thx for the heads-up. Would I be better off just adding the new server with a new IP address as a multi-master, then removing the old one? Not re-using either the hostname or IP? From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:52 PM To: General discussion list

Re: [389-users] Replacing a DS server

2012-03-08 Thread Rich Megginson
On 03/08/2012 10:53 AM, mja...@guesswho.com wrote: @Rich, we are not re-using the hostname, just the IP address. --Mike That's going to be a problem for replication, chaining, tls/ssl, kerberos, and anything else like that which uses the fqdn. *From:*389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [389-users] Replacing a DS server

2012-03-08 Thread mjames
@Rich, we are not re-using the hostname, just the IP address. --Mike From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:47 PM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server proj

Re: [389-users] Replacing a DS server

2012-03-08 Thread Gerhardus Geldenhuis
Hi Its difficult to say wiithout knowing how you have configured your two servers... In setups that I have had previosly I just rebuild the server (OS) and install 389. before I continue I remove the "old" server from the config database as that was multimastered as well. I then continue the 389 r

Re: [389-users] Solaris 10 Clients without anonymous binds

2012-03-08 Thread MATON Brett
Hi Carsten, I'll give it ago, thanks. Brett From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Carsten Grzemba Sent: 08 March 2012 14:34 To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. Subject: Re: [389-use

Re: [389-users] Solaris 10 Clients without anonymous binds

2012-03-08 Thread Carsten Grzemba
Hi, I guess it must be able for the Solaris client to read at least the base so the client can see the supported features: # ldapsearch -h -b "" -s base objectclass="*" should return the supportedcontrols, etc. Am 08.03.12, schrieb MATON Brett : > > > > > > > I’ve got some hosts using S

[389-users] Solaris 10 Clients without anonymous binds

2012-03-08 Thread MATON Brett
I've got some hosts using Solaris 10 cat /etc/release Solaris 10 10/09 s10s_u8wos_08a SPARC Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 16 September