Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

No matter that they are different versions? On Nov 4, 2013 12:21 PM, "Rich Megginson" wrote: > On 11/04/2013 08:16 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: > > Hi Rich, Can you be more specific? > On Nov 4, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rich Megginson" wrote: > >> On 11/03/2013 05:15 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: >> >>>

Re: [389-users] Export Replica Question

On 11/04/2013 12:59 PM, Paul Whitney wrote: I have a master, hub, and 4 consumers. I want to initialize the consumers who have a replication agreement from the hub. Is it okay to export the replica from one replication agreement to a consumer and use the that same replica for the three other

Re: [389-users] PAM Pass through authentication only one threaded

On 11/04/2013 10:46 AM, Jan Tomasek wrote: On 11/04/2013 05:22 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/04/2013 09:08 AM, Jan Tomasek wrote: On 11/04/2013 05:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Does the script open a connection to the same server it is being called from? Yes. So this is a case of self-dead

Re: [389-users] SAMBA.

On 11/04/2013 10:31 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: I m trying to do LDAP authentication using 389DS using SAMBA. I m using ldap ssl = off in smb.conf but when I try to smbpasswd a user I get that this kind of operation needs a secure channel. If I set ldap ssl = start tls, SAMBA does not start co

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

On 11/04/2013 10:25 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: OK, thanks! It would be awesome if that kind of information would be in the 389DS homepage, FAQ section. Or a HOWTO that explains migration process to a newer version of 389DS in a working replication environment. The development philosophy of 3

Re: [389-users] Synching UIDs

You have several Red Hat machines and you want to consolidate the local UIDs? No, this is not supported but there are ways you can make it work. The UID range should be higher than what your local UIDs will be, then your machines will look at LDAP for the information, it does not push, or modify th

Re: [389-users] PAM Pass through authentication only one threaded

On 11/04/2013 05:22 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 11/04/2013 09:08 AM, Jan Tomasek wrote: >> On 11/04/2013 05:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: >> >>> Does the script open a connection to the same server it is being called >>> from? >> >> Yes. > > So this is a case of self-deadlock? I don't understan

[389-users] SAMBA.

I m trying to do LDAP authentication using 389DS using SAMBA. I m using ldap ssl = off in smb.conf but when I try to smbpasswd a user I get that this kind of operation needs a secure channel. If I set ldap ssl = start tls, SAMBA does not start complaining about TLS! Maybe certificate validation i

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

OK, thanks! It would be awesome if that kind of information would be in the 389DS homepage, FAQ section. Or a HOWTO that explains migration process to a newer version of 389DS in a working replication environment. On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: > Rich Megginson wrote: >> >

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/04/2013 09:39 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/04/2013 09:06 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: No matter that they are different versions??? Yes. The replication protocol is the same. The only problems you might

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

On 11/04/2013 08:16 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: Hi Rich, Can you be more specific? On Nov 4, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rich Megginson" > wrote: On 11/03/2013 05:15 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: Hi people ... Nowadays, I have CentOS5 on my servers, but n

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

Hi Rich, Can you be more specific? On Nov 4, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rich Megginson" wrote: > On 11/03/2013 05:15 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: > >> Hi people ... >> >> Nowadays, I have CentOS5 on my servers, but next year I ll start >> setting up CentOS 6 on them. >> >> I ll first install 389DS on the ma

Re: [389-users] PAM Pass through authentication only one threaded

On 11/04/2013 08:05 AM, Jan Tomasek wrote: Hi Rich, On 11/01/2013 04:28 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: If there is 30 or more parallel connections 389 hangs for ever. Very often killing process ldapsearch process does not help. Server is very often unable to restart so I have to kill it with -9. P

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

On 11/03/2013 05:15 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: Hi people ... Nowadays, I have CentOS5 on my servers, but next year I ll start setting up CentOS 6 on them. I ll first install 389DS on the main CentOS5 servers from EPEL repository (currently version 1.2.1) and I guess replication between them l