Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users

2015-10-19 Thread Mizrahi, Yair
Hi Noriko, This is the version I have installed: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-60.el6.x86_64 on CentOS 6.5 I was able to work around the problem by backing up the group and people OU to LDIF files , do the sync (which deleted the affected accounts)and after that importing them back, this caused the LDAP

[389-users] fractional replication and consumers Q

2015-10-19 Thread ghiureai
Hi LIst, I have cfg a multimaster rep env with fractional rep, all agreements are already in placed between suppliers and consumers , all consumers had been cfg with Multi Master Replica option, reading trough RHES 389-ds there is some mentioning about "dedicated consumer" option in repl

Re: [389-users] fractional replication and consumers Q

2015-10-19 Thread Mayberry, Alexander
We refer to a dedicated consumer as "read only". (we use these in our security zones.) Though, I'm sure that's probably not strictly true, it captures the spirit of things. -Original Message- From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject

Re: [389-users] fractional replication and consumers Q

2015-10-19 Thread Rich Megginson
On 10/19/2015 09:43 AM, Mayberry, Alexander wrote: We refer to a dedicated consumer as "read only". (we use these in our security zones.) Though, I'm sure that's probably not strictly true, it captures the spirit of things. Yes. What the console means by "dedicated consumer" is a read only

Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users

2015-10-19 Thread Noriko Hosoi
Thank you for the update. Regarding this symptom: > they are also gets deleted from directory server (around 200 users from 550). I'm curious what's the difference between the deleted 200 users and the rest. Thanks, --noriko On 10/19/2015 12:35 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: Hi Noriko, This is

Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users

2015-10-19 Thread Mizrahi, Yair
i'll do some comparison tomorrow between affected and unaffected user, hopefully I will find something Sent from my Samsung device Original message From: Noriko Hosoi Date: 19/10/2015 19:04 (GMT+02:00) To: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [389-users] WinSync a

Re: [389-users] WinSync agreement deletes directoryt server users

2015-10-19 Thread Noriko Hosoi
On 10/19/2015 09:23 AM, Mizrahi, Yair wrote: i'll do some comparison tomorrow between affected and unaffected user, hopefully I will find something Thanks a lot!! Sent from my Samsung device Original message From: Noriko Hosoi Date: 19/10/2015 19:04 (GMT+02:00) To: 389-u

Re: [389-users] Missing 389-console?

2015-10-19 Thread Gary Algier
Okay, I found it in epel-testing but it does not work. When I open my server group, the administration server shows, but not my directory server. I get a Java Exception: % 389-console Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: com/netscape/admin/dirserv/DSAdmin

Re: [389-users] fractional replication and consumers Q

2015-10-19 Thread Joel Levin
Hi Rich: Can there be multiple-masters simultaneously? i.e. 5 masters - all 5 accepting read-writes simultaneously? Is there a maximum limit? Thanks. On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 10/19/2015 09:43 AM, Mayberry, Alexander wrote: > >> We refer to a dedicated consum

Re: [389-users] fractional replication and consumers Q

2015-10-19 Thread Rich Megginson
On 10/19/2015 03:17 PM, Joel Levin wrote: Hi Rich: Can there be multiple-masters simultaneously? Yes. i.e. 5 masters - all 5 accepting read-writes simultaneously? Yes. Is there a maximum limit? Technically the limit is 65534 read-write masters, but you will probably run into memory,