[389-users] Re: Inadvertent Update Applied to Directory Server

2017-11-22 Thread William Brown
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 13:30 +, Paul Whitney wrote: > We have a few new servers deployed with 389-ds-base version 1.3.5.10- > 21.  These servers were deployed in an environment where auto- > patching happens and we forgot to disable that feature. > > Overnight the servers were updated to 389-ds

[389-users] Re: Last Successful Replication Time Stamp on Console

2017-11-22 Thread William Brown
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 13:20 +, Paul Whitney wrote: > We are seeing an issue with our replication agreements on 389DS.  > When we look at the Console, we used to be able to tell when was the > last successful attempt to replicate and end of said replication.  > Same thing for Initialization stat

[389-users] Inadvertent Update Applied to Directory Server

2017-11-22 Thread Paul Whitney
We have a few new servers deployed with 389-ds-base version 1.3.5.10-21.  These servers were deployed in an environment where auto-patching happens and we forgot to disable that feature. Overnight the servers were updated to 389-ds-base version 1.3.6.1-19.  All of the upgraded servers are now

[389-users] Last Successful Replication Time Stamp on Console

2017-11-22 Thread Paul Whitney
We are seeing an issue with our replication agreements on 389DS.  When we look at the Console, we used to be able to tell when was the last successful attempt to replicate and end of said replication.  Same thing for Initialization state. With the new 389DS (currently using version 1.3.5.10-21)